Video Poker - Other Games
One-coin pay table
--------------------
Pair, 6-10’s 1
Pair, J-A’s 2
2 Pair 3
3 of a Kind 4
Straight 6
Flush 9
Full House 12
4 of a Kind 50
Straight-Flush 200
Royal Flush 1,000
2-5 coins, multiply 1-coin payout
5-coin Royal pays 20,000 coins
With correct play, what is the return of these machines?
As a side note, these machines earn slot points at the same rate as video poker (half the rate of the regular slots), but I find that I accumulate point faster due to the obvious double-down situations. Does that indirectly improve the return?
I enjoy your website very much! Thanks!!
1 = 0.926273 + 0.00002537*j
j = (1-0.926273)/ 0.00002537 = 2,906.
The 2,906 is measured in bet units. For a $1 machine ($5 total bet) the breakeven point would be $5*2,906 = $14,530. So, $12,000 is still a long way away from break-even. Before some perfectionist writes me, as the progressive goes up, the optimal strategy will change, to be more aggressive towards playing for royals. My answer assumes the player follows the same 6/5 optimal strategy the entire time.
A simple approximation for any 52-card video poker game is to add 0.5% for every extra 1,000 coins in the meter. In the case of a $10,100 meter, that is $6,100 higher than a non-progressive. It is a dollar game, so that is 6,100 coins, so add 0.5% × (6,100/1,000) = 3.05% to the base return. The base return is 92.63%, so the total return could be approximated as 94.66% + 3.05% = 97.71%. The actual return for a $10,100 meter is 97.75%, so pretty close.
6
7
8
9
, that it is correct to hold the straight. It just seems counter-intuitive to me, but if you could explain in a little more detail about why going for the straight flush is poor strategy, I would be grateful.
is (2/47)×50 + (7/47)×6 + (5/47)×4 = 3.4468. The expected return of the straight at 4 is much more.
The following table shows for each initial hand the pre-double win, pre-double probability, number of doubles required, post-double win, and probability achieving the post-double win, including the $250 bonus. The lower right cell shows a return of 115.5%. You will get a jackpot every 297 hands on average, with an average jackpot of $1,717.46.
8-5 Triple Bonus Return Table with $250 Bonus for Wins of $1,200 or More
| Pre-Double Win | Pays | Pre-Double Probability | Doubles Required | Post-Double Win | Post-Double Probability | Return |
| Royal flush | $4000 | 0.000026 | 0 | $4250 | 0.000026 | 0.02193 |
| Straight flush | $500 | 0.000118 | 2 | $2250 | 0.00003 | 0.013322 |
| 4 aces | $1200 | 0.000235 | 0 | $1450 | 0.000235 | 0.068227 |
| 4 2-4 | $600 | 0.000542 | 1 | $1450 | 0.000271 | 0.078557 |
| 4 5-K | $250 | 0.001629 | 3 | $2250 | 0.000204 | 0.091637 |
| Full house | $40 | 0.010546 | 5 | $1530 | 0.00033 | 0.100842 |
| Flush | $25 | 0.011055 | 6 | $1850 | 0.000173 | 0.063913 |
| Straight | $20 | 0.012738 | 6 | $1530 | 0.000199 | 0.060902 |
| 3 of a kind | $15 | 0.075542 | 7 | $2170 | 0.00059 | 0.256136 |
| Two pair | $5 | 0.123065 | 8 | $1530 | 0.000481 | 0.147101 |
| Jacks or better | $5 | 0.211575 | 8 | $1530 | 0.000826 | 0.252898 |
| Total | 0.447071 | 0 | 0 | 0.003364 | 1.155465 |

To the best of my knowledge, the loosest video poker game in Vegas is the 101.60% 5¢ Loose Deuces game at the Fitzgeralds. It is located upstairs, near the sports book.
Update: This answer was correct at the time of writing. However, said machine has since disappeared. See my Ask the Wizard #292 for the new loosest video poker machine in Vegas.
Video Poker Return and Hit Frequency
| Game | Return | Hit Frequency |
| Deuces and joker wild | 0.990675 | 0.503768 |
| Tens or better | 0.991390 | 0.494518 |
| Bonus Poker | 0.991660 | 0.455145 |
| Jacks or Better | 0.995439 | 0.454565 |
| Double Double Bonus | 0.989808 | 0.447163 |
| Deuces wild | 0.994179 | 0.442807 |
| Joker poker | 0.984425 | 0.441435 |
| Double Bonus | 0.991065 | 0.431893 |
| One-eyed jacks | 0.989562 | 0.370122 |
| Royal aces | 0.991981 | 0.300874 |
Royal Aces Bonus Poker
| Hand | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal flush | 800 | 490,090,668 | 0.000025 | 0.019669 |
| Straight flush | 100 | 2,417,714,292 | 0.000121 | 0.012129 |
| Four aces | 800 | 4,936,967,256 | 0.000248 | 0.198140 |
| Four 2-4 | 80 | 10,579,511,880 | 0.000531 | 0.042460 |
| Four 5-K | 50 | 31,662,193,440 | 0.001588 | 0.079421 |
| Full house | 10 | 213,464,864,880 | 0.010709 | 0.107090 |
| Flush | 5 | 280,594,323,000 | 0.014077 | 0.070384 |
| Straight | 4 | 276,071,121,072 | 0.013850 | 0.055399 |
| Three of a kind | 3 | 1,470,711,394,284 | 0.073782 | 0.221346 |
| Two pair | 1 | 2,398,705,865,028 | 0.120337 | 0.120337 |
| Pair of aces | 1 | 1,307,753,371,584 | 0.065607 | 0.065607 |
| Nothing | 0 | 13,935,843,099,816 | 0.699126 | 0.000000 |
| Total | 19,933,230,517,200 | 1.000000 | 0.991982 |
The standard deviation is 13.58! That is over three times as high as 9-6 Jacks or Better at 4.42.
However, if you limit me to games that are easy to find, my nomination is Triple Double Bonus, with a standard deviation of 9.91. Here is that pay table.
Triple Double Bonus Poker
| Hand | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal flush | 800 | 439,463,508 | 0.000022 | 0.017637 |
| Straight flush | 50 | 2,348,724,720 | 0.000118 | 0.005891 |
| 4 aces + 2-4 | 800 | 1,402,364,496 | 0.000070 | 0.056282 |
| 4 2-4 + A-4 | 400 | 3,440,009,028 | 0.000173 | 0.069031 |
| 4 aces + 5-K | 160 | 2,952,442,272 | 0.000148 | 0.023699 |
| 4 2-4 + 5-K | 80 | 6,376,626,780 | 0.000320 | 0.025592 |
| 4 5-K | 50 | 31,673,324,076 | 0.001589 | 0.079449 |
| Full house | 9 | 206,321,656,284 | 0.010351 | 0.093156 |
| Flush | 7 | 311,320,443,672 | 0.015618 | 0.109327 |
| Straight | 4 | 252,218,322,636 | 0.012653 | 0.050613 |
| 3 of a kind | 2 | 1,468,173,074,448 | 0.073655 | 0.147309 |
| Two pair | 1 | 2,390,581,734,264 | 0.119929 | 0.119929 |
| Jacks or better | 1 | 3,944,045,609,748 | 0.197863 | 0.197863 |
| Nothing | 0 | 11,311,936,721,268 | 0.567491 | 0.000000 |
| Total | 19,933,230,517,200 | 1.000000 | 0.995778 |
This question was raised and discussed in the forum of my companion site Wizard of Vegas.
- 6-5 Bonus Poker progressive.
- 2% meter rise on royal flush.
- 5-coin game.
Now assume the following about me.
- Minimum return to play of 100.5%.
- I’m capable of playing a progressive until it hits.
- I know perfect 6-5 Bonus Poker strategy for a 4000-coin royal.
What is the least the jackpot should be for me to play?
I might add that if you start playing 4000-coin jackpot strategy at exactly a 7,281.8 jackpot, you can expect to profit 201.18 bets. However, if you took the time to learn the strategy changes for a 7,281.8 coin jackpot, then your expected profit would be 234.31 coins.
On a related note, I just finished reading The Secret World of Video Poker Progressives by Frank Kneeland. This book has lots of formulas for much more complicated progressive situations, as well as practical advice and stories based on his years running a team of progressive hunters. I recommend it for advantage progressive video poker players.
I am following your Bonus Deuces Wild strategy, but the practice game’s error warnings sometimes disagree with it. For example, the strategy tells me to hold a deuce with suited 6-8, while the trainer tells me to hold only the deuce. I have also received conflicting warnings about holding four cards to a flush with one deuce, including deuce plus suited 4-5-10 and 7-9-A.
I cannot find two pair in the “No Deuce Dealt” strategy. Where should it appear?
After checking more closely, I noticed that the printed strategy is for a 13/4/3 pay table, while the practice game I was playing uses 9/4/4. Is that the reason for the differences, and can you offer a practice game that matches the 13/4/3 strategy?
You found the source of the confusion. Video poker strategy depends on the exact pay table. The strategy you were reading was for 13/4/3 Bonus Deuces Wild, while the practice game you were playing used 9/4/4. Those numbers refer to the payouts for a straight flush, four of a kind, and a full house, respectively.
Deuce plus suited 6-8. For the dealt hand 2♦ 6♥ 8♥ K♣ Q♠, the expected returns per unit bet are:
| Pay table | Hold deuce + 6-8 | Hold deuce only | Better hold |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13/4/3 | 0.997225 | 0.964724 | Deuce + 6-8 |
| 9/4/4 | 0.913043 | 0.955182 | Deuce only |
The higher straight-flush payout makes the three-card draw worthwhile under 13/4/3. Under 9/4/4, holding only the deuce is better for this hand. The warning you received was consistent with the pay table you were playing.
Two pair with no deuces. Two pair does not pay by itself in this game. If you hold both pairs, eight of the 47 possible replacement cards produce a full house: the four deuces and the four remaining cards matching the two pair ranks.
- When a full house pays 3, holding both pairs returns 24/47 = 0.510638. Holding one pair is better, so two pair is deliberately absent from the 13/4/3 strategy list.
- When a full house pays 4, holding both pairs returns 32/47 = 0.680851. That beats holding either single pair, so two pair appears at number 12 on the 9/4/4 “No Deuce Dealt” list.
Four to a flush with one deuce. The same pay-table difference explains these warnings. On the 9/4/4 strategy list, every one-deuce four-card flush draw ranks above holding only the deuce. The 13/4/3 list is more selective, including the deuce plus suited 4-5-10 and 7-9-A combinations you mentioned.
For the 9/4/4 game, use the 9/4/4 Bonus Deuces Wild strategy. Its exceptionless strategy returns 99.4464%.
We now also offer a 13/4/3 Bonus Deuces Wild practice game, which you can use with the matching 13/4/3 strategy. Always match the strategy to the pay table displayed on the game.
I believe two entries in your IGT Major Multipliers return tables are incorrect.
For NSU Deuces Wild with a 25-16-10-4-4-3 pay table, the base return is shown as about 99.72%, but the feature return is only 95.44%. The feature return should be much closer to the base return.
For Deuces Wild Bonus with a 13-4-3-3 pay table, you show a base return of 97.36%, although I believe it is 98.80% when the wild royal pays 25. That also makes the listed 97.39% feature return look too low. Can you check these figures?
You were right on both counts. We corrected the Major Multipliers return tables. The correct figures are:
| Game | Pay table | Base return | Feature return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSU Deuces Wild | 25-16-10-4-4-3 | 99.7283% | 99.7838% |
| Deuces Wild Bonus | 13-4-3-3 | 98.8025% | 98.8841% |
NSU Deuces Wild: The old 95.4439% feature return belonged to 6/5 Bonus Poker Deluxe and had been copied into the wrong row.
Deuces Wild Bonus: The old 97.3644% base return and 97.3986% feature return resulted from a misplaced pay-table row. A 10-4-4-3 row that is not offered on the game had been inserted, and the 13-4-3-3 figures had been omitted. The wild royal was not the cause; every return in that section uses a wild royal payout of 25.
The five Deuces Wild Bonus pay tables offered on Major Multipliers are 9-4-4-3, 13-4-3-3, 10-4-3-3, 12-4-3-2, and 10-4-3-2. All five now show the correct returns.
We confirmed the corrected figures with Action Gaming, which designed the game, and checked every base return with our own calculations. Thank you for catching these errors.