Home Gambling Info Odds Gambling Online Ask the Wizard Play for Fun Blog Radio Video | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason #1 why the Wizard likes Bovada: Excellent customer support The thing that separates Bovada from the rest is its customer support. Many other online gaming companies outsource their support. It can be difficult getting a response from them, and if you do it is often slow and handled by somebody with little understanding of gambling or even of English. But Bovada’s support is handled by Bovada, and their support staff is actually knowledgeable and helpful. I’m so confident that you’ll have a good experience with Bovada that if you have a problem getting paid and you can’t resolve it with them on your own, I’ll talk to them myself. I personally have known the Bovada management for about three years and always found them to be professional, friendly, and knowledgeable. I have also personally visited one of their call centers so I could see first-hand how they handle customer issues. (More on my mediation service.) If you have a problem with any other casino besides Bovada, I can’t help you. I get complaints from players of other online casinos every day who have difficulty getting paid. However that isn’t my job nor my problem. If you play at Bovada after clicking through my site I’ll stand behind you 100%. Any place else and you’re on your own. |
Blackjack side betsLast Update: May 12, 2012 This appendix shall explain and analyze some blackjack side bets I have seen. In the U.S. a W2G tax form is generated on any table game win that exceeds $600 and pays 300 to 1 or more. Here is an index of the blackjack side bets covered in this appendix.
Super SevensThe following is the payoff table for Super Sevens:
These awards are not cumulative, in other words if youget three sevens you don't get paid for one and two sevensas well. If the dealer gets a blackjack the player can stillget paid for at least two sevens. At some casinos if theplayer has two sevens and the dealer gets a blackjack athird card will be dealt to the player for the chance to getthree sevens. The following probability table 1 shows the probability,payoff, and expected return of each hand. This table assumes(1) a third card is not dealt if the player has two sevensand the dealer gets a blackjack and (2) six decks.
The following probability table 2 shows the probability,payoff, and expected return of each hand. This table assumes(1) a third card is dealt if the player has two sevens andthe dealer gets a blackjack and (2) six decks.
The tables above show a house edge of 12.61% if theplayer does not get a third card if the dealer gets ablackjack and a house edge of 11.40% if the player isguaranteed to get three cards. Below are the derivations of the table 1 probabilitieswhere n is the number of decks. The combin(x,y) function isthe number of ways to arrange y cards out of x. For examplecombin(52,5)=2598960, the number of possible five card pokerhands from a single deck. Let p2 denote theprobability that dealer will get a blackjack if the player'sfirst two cards are sevens. Let p3 denote theprobability that dealer will get a blackjack if the player'sfirst three cards are sevens. The combin(x,y) function canbe used in Excel, by the way. Probability of 1 seven: (1/13)*(48*n/(52*n-1)) Probability of 2 unsuited sevens:[combin(4n,2)-4*combin(n,2)]/combin(52*n,2) *[(48*n)/(52*n-2) * (1-p2) +p2] Probability of 2 suited sevens:4*combin(n,2)/combin(52*n,2) * [(48*n)/(52*n-2) *(1-p2) + p2] Probability of 3 unsuited sevens:[combin(4n,3)-4*combin(n,3)]/combin(52*n,3) *(1-p3) Probability of 3 suited sevens:4*combin(n,3)/combin(52*n,3) * (1-p3) p2 = 4*(4*n)2 /combin(52*n-2,2) p3 = 4*(4*n)2 /combin(52*n-3,2) Below are the probabilities for table 2 where the playeris guaranteed to get a third card. Probability of 1 seven: (1/13)*(48*n/(52*n-1)) Probability of 2 unsuited sevens:[combin(4n,2)-4*combin(n,2)]/combin(52*n,2) Probability of 2 suited sevens:4*combin(n,2)/combin(52*n,2) * (48*n)/(52*n-2) Probability of 3 unsuited sevens:[combin(4n,3)-4*combin(n,3)]/combin(52*n,3) Probability of 3 suited sevens:4*combin(n,3)/combin(52*n,3)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Royal Match — Version 1 — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return | Royal match | 25 | 144 | 0.002968 | 0.074202 | Easy match | 2.5 | 11,868 | 0.244620 | 0.611551 | No match | -1 | 36,504 | 0.752412 | -0.752412 | Total | 48,516 | 1.000000 | -0.066658 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Match — Version 2 — One Deck | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal match | 10 | 4 | 0.003017 | 0.030166 |
| Easy match | 3 | 308 | 0.232278 | 0.696833 |
| No match | -1 | 1,014 | 0.764706 | -0.764706 |
| Total | 1,326 | 1.000000 | -0.037707 | |
The following table displays the house edge for eachversion given the number of decks used.
Royal Match — House Edge | ||
Number | Version 1 | Version 2 |
1 | 0.108597 | 0.037707 |
2 | 0.083271 | 0.008215 |
4 | 0.070792 | -0.006317 |
6 | 0.066658 | -0.011130 |
8 | 0.064597 | -0.013531 |
The probabilities for the royal match are easy to derive.Lets use n for the number of decks of cards. The number oftwo card combinations is combin(52×n,2). The number of waysto make a royal match is 4*n2. This is becausethere are 4 suits and n ways to choose the queen and n waysto choose the king. The number of ways to make an easy matchis 4×(combin(13×n,2)-n2). The 4 is the number ofsuits and combin(13×n,2) is the number of ways to arrange 2cards from a given suit. You must also subtract the numberof ways to make a royal match.
The probability of an easy match is4×(combin(13×n,2)-n2)/combin(52×n,2).
The probability of a royal match is4×n2/combin(52×n,2).
In a third version there is a separate pay for a suited blackjack as follows.
The following table shows the expected value for a 6-deck game is -3.70%.
Royal Match - Version 3 - Six Decks | ||||
Hand | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Royal match | 144 | 0.002968 | 25 | 0.074202 |
| Suited blackjack | 576 | 0.011872 | 5 | 0.059362 |
| All other matches | 11292 | 0.232748 | 2.5 | 0.58187 |
| Loss | 36504 | 0.752412 | -1 | -0.752412 |
| Total | 48516 | 1 | -0.036977 | |
The next table shows the house edge for various number of decks for version 3.
Royal Match - Version 3 | |
Decks | House Edge |
| 1 | 7.84% |
| 2 | 5.34% |
| 3 | 4.52% |
| 4 | 4.11% |
| 5 | 3.86% |
| 6 | 3.70% |
| 7 | 3.58% |
| 8 | 3.49% |
The Shufflemaster TMS 300 is an electronic blackjack game, played facing a giant video screen of a dealer. It features a Royal Match side bet, adding a pay for the player and dealer both having a royal match. Following is the return table for six decks.
| Royal Match — Version 4 — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player and Dealer Royal Match | 1000 | 19152 | 0.000008 | 0.008242 |
| Player royal match | 25 | 6877728 | 0.00296 | 0.073996 |
| Suited | 2.5 | 568417860 | 0.24462 | 0.611551 |
| Loser | -1 | 1748359080 | 0.752412 | -0.752412 |
| Total | 2323673820 | 1 | -0.058622 | |
The next table shows the house edge by number of decks.
| Royal Match — Version 4 — 1-8 Decks | |
| Number of Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 1 | 10.14% |
| 2 | 7.59% |
| 3 | 6.73% |
| 4 | 6.3% |
| 5 | 6.04% |
| 6 | 5.86% |
| 7 | 5.74% |
| 8 | 5.64% |
Version 5 of the Royal Match is a progressive jackpot on ShuffleMaster TableMax units. These are the electronic blackjack games with a big screen, usually showing a pretty and very buxom dealer.
In this version, the side bet is always $1. It pays a progressive jackpot for a "Crown Treasure," which is both the dealer and player having a Royal Match. Smaller pays are $60 for a player only royal match, and $10 for a player straight flush, which I assume means the player's first two cards are suited and consecutive, including A-2.
There is also a $500 envy bonus, which pays if you make the side bet, and another player gets a Crown Treasure. The other player does not have to make the side bet for other players to qualify for the Envy Bonus.
The following table shows a hypothetical return table, for six decks, a $10,000 jackpot, and no other players.
| Six-Deck Progressive Royal Match — $10,000 Jackpot and No Other Players | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Treasure | $10,000 | 19,152.00 | 0.000008 | 0.082421 |
| Royal Match | $60 | 6,877,728.00 | 0.002960 | 0.177591 |
| Straight Flush | $10 | 82,762,560.00 | 0.035617 | 0.356171 |
| Loser | $0 | 2,234,014,380.00 | 0.961415 | 0.000000 |
| Total | 2,323,673,820.00 | 1.000000 | 0.616183 | |
The general formula for the return in a six-deck game is 0.533762 + 0.082421×j + 0.004121× p, where j is the jackpot divided by $10,000, and p is the number of other players (not counting yourself).
The next table shows the breakeven points, in which the expected return is exactly 100%, given the number of other players, in a six-deck game.
| Progressive Royal Match Breakeven Points | |
| Other Players | Breakeven Point |
|---|---|
| 6 | $53,567.70 |
| 5 | $54,067.70 |
| 4 | $54,567.70 |
| 3 | $55,067.70 |
| 2 | $55,567.70 |
| 1 | $56,067.70 |
| 0 | $56,567.70 |
Streak is an optional blackjack side bet I noticed atCaesars in Atlantic City in April of 2000. Since that time I have seen it displayed at the Global Gaming Expo, where I have been given rule updates. Streak is a simplebet on winning a specified number of consecutive bets. Ifthe player splits then it is the net win that counts towardwhether the hand as a whole won or lost. For example if theplayer split and won one hand and pushed the other the handwould count as a net win. In the event of a push or breakingeven after a split the hand would not count for purposes ofthe side bet, neither advancing the number of consecutivewins nor breaking the winning streak. The player may bet ona winning streak from 2 to 5, or as many of these asdesired.
My blackjack appendix 4 addresses the probability of a net win or loss. However that table includes surrender, which is usually not offered, and a player may decline to take anyway, if a Streak bet were on the line. So I reran my simulation with the following rules: six decks, dealer stands on soft 17, no surrender, player may split up to four hands, double on any two cards, double after split allowed, resplit aces not allowed, cut card used. Here are the results of the simulation.
| Net Win in Blackjack | |||
| Net win | Simulation Total | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 1400 | 0.000001 | 0.000006 |
| 7 | 12763 | 0.000007 | 0.000048 |
| 6 | 76258 | 0.000041 | 0.000245 |
| 5 | 284607 | 0.000152 | 0.000762 |
| 4 | 1435913 | 0.000769 | 0.003077 |
| 3 | 4584941 | 0.002456 | 0.007368 |
| 2 | 114511009 | 0.061343 | 0.122686 |
| 1.5 | 84495618 | 0.045264 | 0.067896 |
| 1 | 603601989 | 0.323348 | 0.323348 |
| 0 | 163884660 | 0.087793 | 0 |
| -1 | 805017526 | 0.431246 | -0.431246 |
| -2 | 83647458 | 0.04481 | -0.089619 |
| -3 | 3984819 | 0.002135 | -0.006404 |
| -4 | 963035 | 0.000516 | -0.002064 |
| -5 | 180925 | 0.000097 | -0.000485 |
| -6 | 37217 | 0.00002 | -0.00012 |
| -7 | 5072 | 0.000003 | -0.000019 |
| -8 | 417 | 0 | -0.000002 |
| Total | 1866725627 | 1 | -0.004521 |
The lower right cell shows a house edge of 0.4521%. This may look a bit high for the rules, especially against my blackjack calculator. Most house edge figures, including those of my calculator are based on a continuously shuffled game. The use of a cut card, as was the case in this simulation, adds 0.02% to the house edge with six decks. For more information on the cut card effect please see my blackjack appendix 10.
Adding up the wins and losses we get the following.
| Net Win in Blackjack | |
| Event | Probability |
|---|---|
| Win | 43.34% |
| Loss | 47.88% |
| Tie | 8.78% |
| Win given no tie | 47.51% |
| Loss given no tie | 52.49% |
The probability of winning n hands in a row is simply 0.4751n. The following return tables show the pay table, probability of winning, and return for all four streak bets, under both the new and old rules.
| Streak Bet Return Table - New Rules | |||
| Streak Bet | Pays | Probability Win | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 0.225712 | -0.097154 |
| 3 | 8 | 0.107234 | -0.034898 |
| 4 | 18 | 0.050946 | -0.032032 |
| 5 | 38 | 0.024204 | -0.05605 |
The table above shows that under the new, more liberal, rules the best bet is on a streak of 4, with a house edge of 3.20%.
| Streak Bet Return Table - Old Rules | |||
| Streak Bet | Pays | Probability Win | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 0.225712 | -0.097154 |
| 3 | 7 | 0.107234 | -0.142132 |
| 4 | 17 | 0.050946 | -0.082978 |
| 5 | 37 | 0.024204 | -0.080254 |
This pair of side bets pay even money if the player can correctly bet if the sum of the player's first two cardswill be over or under 13. Aces count as 1. At the Majestic Casino in Panama City, Panama, the player may also bet on exactly 13, which pays 10 to 1. The following is the house edge according to the number of decks. The house edge for exactly 13 is calculated at 10 to 1.
| Over/Under 13 | |||
| Decks | Over 13 | Under 13 | Exactly 13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.79% | 10.11% | 7.09% |
| 2 | 6.65% | 10.08% | 7.99% |
| 4 | 6.58% | 10.07% | 8.44% |
| 6 | 6.55% | 10.07% | 8.58% |
| 8 | 6.54% | 10.06% | 8.66% |
"Pair Square" is a blackjack side bet I have seen in Tunica, Las Vegas, and Reno. It wins if the player's first two cards are a pair, usually more for a suited pair. I have seen or heard of a number of pay tables through the years. Following are return tables for some of them.
| Pair Square — 12-10 Pay Table — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited pair | 12 | 780 | 0.016077 | 0.192926 |
| Non-suited pair | 10 | 2808 | 0.057878 | 0.578778 |
| No pair | -1 | 44928 | 0.926045 | -0.926045 |
| Total | 48516 | 1.000000 | -0.154341 | |
| Pair Square — 12-12 Pay Table — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited pair | 12 | 780 | 0.016077 | 0.192926 |
| Non-suited pair | 12 | 2808 | 0.057878 | 0.694534 |
| No pair | -1 | 44928 | 0.926045 | -0.926045 |
| Total | 48516 | 1.000000 | -0.038585 | |
| Pair Square — 15-10 Pay Table — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited pair | 15 | 780 | 0.016077 | 0.241158 |
| Non-suited pair | 10 | 2808 | 0.057878 | 0.578778 |
| No pair | -1 | 44928 | 0.926045 | -0.926045 |
| Total | 48516 | 1.000000 | -0.106109 | |
| Pair Square — 20-10 Pay Table — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited pair | 20 | 780 | 0.016077 | 0.321543 |
| Non-suited pair | 10 | 2808 | 0.057878 | 0.578778 |
| No pair | -1 | 44928 | 0.926045 | -0.926045 |
| Total | 48516 | 1.000000 | -0.025723 | |
| Pair Square — 25-10 Pay Table — Two Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited pair | 25 | 52 | 0.009709 | 0.242718 |
| Non-suited pair | 10 | 312 | 0.058252 | 0.582524 |
| No pair | -1 | 4992 | 0.932039 | -0.932039 |
| Total | 5356 | 1.000000 | -0.106796 | |
| Pair Square — 15 Pay Table — One Deck | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-suited pair | 15 | 78 | 0.058824 | 0.882353 |
| No pair | -1 | 1248 | 0.941176 | -0.941176 |
| Total | 1326 | 1.000000 | -0.058824 | |
The next table summarizes the house edge for all known pay tables by number of decks. A negative house edge denotes a player advantage, for a combination of pay table and number of decks you're unlikely to ever see, but let me know if you do.
| Pair Square — House Edge Summary | ||||||
| Decks | 0-15 Pay table | 12-10 Pay table | 12-12 Pay table | 15-10 Pay table | 20-10 Pay table | 25-10 Pay table |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.88% | 35.29% | 23.53% | 35.29% | 35.29% | 35.29% |
| 2 | 5.83% | 23.30% | 11.65% | 20.39% | 15.53% | 10.68% |
| 3 | 5.81% | 19.35% | 7.74% | 15.48% | 9.03% | 2.58% |
| 4 | 5.80% | 17.39% | 5.80% | 13.04% | 5.80% | -1.45% |
| 5 | 5.79% | 16.22% | 4.63% | 11.58% | 3.86% | -3.86% |
| 6 | 5.79% | 15.43% | 3.86% | 10.61% | 2.57% | -5.47% |
| 7 | 5.79% | 14.88% | 3.31% | 9.92% | 1.65% | -6.61% |
| 8 | 5.78% | 14.46% | 2.89% | 9.40% | 0.96% | -7.47% |
Caesars Palace in Las Vegas at one time offered a side bet on a tie at two of their blackjack tables. If the player and dealer do tie the side bet pays 10 to 1. The player may bet no more than 50% of their original blackjack wager on the side bet. If the player splits he must also split the side bet. If the player doubles, he does not double the side bet. For the analysis I assumed for the following blackjack rules:
Assuming the rules and strategy above, I show an overall house edge of 0.24%, which is the expected player win divided by the initial 1.5 units bet. If a winning blackjack paid 6-5, then the house edge would be 1.15%.
In August 2010 I noticed another version of side betting on a tie in blackjack at Harrah's Las Vegas. Unlike version 1, where all ties pay 10 to 1, at Harrah's you could bet on all six possible ties individually, or on a low or a high tie. As I recall, the rules were:
The layout has betting circles for 17, 18, 19, and LS (left side) tie wagers on the left of the betting circle for the blackjack wagers. The other four tie wagers are on the right side. The player may bet up to half his blackjack wager on the sum of the four left side tie wagers, and likewise up to half on on the right side.
If the player does bet a tie, it significantly changes the strategy. The player will do more hitting, and less of everything else. There is a separate strategy for each tie wager. I won't bother to publish them unless the game gets a significant number of placements.
I spent all day trying to analyze this one, but the doubling and splitting rules made it too difficult. So I'm quoting below pay table #4 from the game owner's web site, blackjacktie.com
, with permission.
| Tie (version 2) House Edge | ||
| Tie Wager | Pays | House Edge |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | 50 | 2.41% |
| 18 | 45 | 5.79% |
| 19 | 50 | 3.67% |
| 20 | 25 | 8.47% |
| 21 | 125 | 10.85% |
| BJ | 400 | 7.18% |
| LS (17, 18, 19) | 15 | 8.07% |
| RS (20, 21, BJ) | 20 | 9.39% |
Version 1
Version 1 of 21+3 I noticed atthe Las Vegas Hilton in April, 2001. The side bet pays basedon the player's first two cards and the dealer's up card. Ifthe three cards equal a flush, straight, straight flush, orthree of a kind the side bet pays 9 to 1. The followingtable shows the probability of each hand in a six-deck game,as played at the Hilton.
21+3 - 6 decks | ||||
Hand | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
Straight flush | 10368 | 0.002068 | 9 to 1 | 0.018613 |
Three of a kind | 26312 | 0.005248 | 9 to 1 | 0.047236 |
Straight | 155520 | 0.031021 | 9 to 1 | 0.279192 |
Flush | 236736 | 0.047221 | 9 to 1 | 0.424993 |
Pair+flush | 56160 | 0.011202 | 9 to 1 | 0.100819 |
Pair (no flush) | 977184 | 0.194918 | -1 to 1 | -0.194918 |
Nothing | 3551040 | 0.708321 | -1 to 1 | -0.708321 |
Total | 5013320 | 1 | to 1 | -0.032386 |
The house edge under these rules is 3.24%.
Version 2
At the Regent in Las Vegas all hands listed above, plus apair, pay 5 to 2. I'll call this version 2. Two decks are used in this version. Thefollowing table shows a house edge under these rules of 2.78%.
21+3 - 2 decks | ||||
Hand | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
Straight flush | 384 | 0.002109 | 2.5 to 1 | 0.005272 |
Three of a kind | 728 | 0.003998 | 2.5 to 1 | 0.009994 |
Straight | 5760 | 0.03163 | 2.5 to 1 | 0.079076 |
Flush | 8768 | 0.048148 | 2.5 to 1 | 0.120371 |
Pair | 34944 | 0.19189 | 2.5 to 1 | 0.479726 |
Nothing | 131520 | 0.722225 | -1 to 1 | -0.722225 |
Total | 182104 | 1 | -0.027786 | |
Version 3
I have an unconfirmed report that Internet casinos using Wagerworks software use the following pay table, which I will call "Version 3."
| 21+3 — Version 3 — Six Decks | ||||
| Hand | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited three of a kind | 100 | 1040 | 0.000207 | 0.020745 |
| Three of a kind | 33 | 25272 | 0.005041 | 0.166352 |
| Straight flush | 35 | 10368 | 0.002068 | 0.072383 |
| Straight | 10 | 155520 | 0.031021 | 0.310214 |
| Flush | 5 | 292896 | 0.058424 | 0.292118 |
| Loss | -1 | 4528224 | 0.903239 | -0.903239 |
| Total | 5013320 | 1 | -0.041427 | |
Although Wager Works only uses six decks in their blackjack game, as far as I know, here is the house edge for 3 to 8 decks.
| 21+3 — Version 3 — 3-8 Decks | |
| Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 3 | 7.76% |
| 4 | 5.99% |
| 5 | 4.89% |
| 6 | 4.14% |
| 7 | 3.60% |
| 8 | 3.18% |
Sweet Sixteen is a blackjack side bet I noticed at theLas Vegas Club in April 2001. It is played with a six-deckshoe and pays based on the player's first two cards. Thefollowing table shows each paying hand, the probability,payoff, and contribution to the total return.
Sweet Sixteen | |||
Hand | Probability | Pays | Return |
16-21 points | 0.31907 | 1 to 1 | 0.63814 |
One ace | 0.142468 | 1 to 1 | 0.284937 |
Two aces | 0.005689 | 2 to 1 | 0.017067 |
Pair 2's-7's | 0.034133 | push | 0.034133 |
Total | 0.50136 | 0.974277 | |
The lower right cell shows a return of 97.43%, for ahouse edge of 2.57%. Here is the house edge for othernumbers of decks.
Dare any Pair is a side bet I noticed at the Lady Luck inApril 2001. It simply pays 11 to 1 if the player's first twocards are a pair. Six decks are used. The probability of apair is 0.073954984 for a house edge of 11.25%. Here is thehouse edge for other numbers of decks.
This is a common side bet found in many casinos such as the Wizard's Casino
(nice name) in Seattle. Any player 20-point hand wins something. There are three possible pay tables, A-C, as follows:
| Lucky Ladies — Pay Table A and B | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hand | Table A | Table B |
| Q of hearts pair & dealer has BJ | 1000 to 1 | 1000 to 1 |
| Q of hearts pair | 125 to 1 | 200 to 1 |
| Matched 20 (same rank and suit) | 19 to 1 | 25 to 1 |
| Suited 20 | 9 to 1 | 10 to 1 |
| Unsuited 20 | 4 to 1 | 4 to 1 |
| Non-20 | -1 to 1 | -1 to 1 |
| Lucky Ladies — Pay Table C | |
|---|---|
| Hand | Table C |
| Pair of queens with dealer BJ | 250 to 1 |
| Pair of queens | 25 to 1 |
| Ranked 20 | 9 to 1 |
| Suited 20 | 6 to 1 |
| Any 20 | 3 to 1 |
| Non-20 | -1 to 1 |
The next table is an analysis of pay table A with six decks.
| Lucky Ladies Pay Table A -- 6 decks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hand | Permutations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Q of hearts pair & dealer has BJ | 135360 | 0.000015 | 1000 to 1 | 0.014563 |
| Q of hearts pair | 2738340 | 0.000295 | 125 to 1 | 0.036827 |
| Matched 20 (same rank and suit) | 43105500 | 0.004638 | 19 to 1 | 0.088115 |
| Suited 20 | 193112640 | 0.020777 | 9 to 1 | 0.186990 |
| Unsuited 20 | 744863040 | 0.080139 | 4 to 1 | 0.320554 |
| Non-20 | 8310740400 | 0.894138 | -1 to 1 | -0.894138 |
| Total | 9294695280 | 0 | -0.247089 | |
The lower right cell shows a return of 75.29%, or a houseedge of 24.71%.
The next table is an analysis of pay table C with one deck.| Lucky Ladies Pay Table C -- 1 deck | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hand | Permutations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Pair of queens with dealer BJ | 1344 | 0.000207 | 250 to 1 | 0.051713 |
| Pair of queens | 28056 | 0.004318 | 25 to 1 | 0.107951 |
| Ranked 20 | 88200 | 0.013575 | 9 to 1 | 0.122172 |
| Suited 20 | 137200 | 0.021116 | 6 to 1 | 0.126697 |
| Any 20 | 411600 | 0.063348 | 3 to 1 | 0.190045 |
| Non-20 | 5831000 | 0.897436 | -1 to 1 | -0.897436 |
| Total | 6497400 | 1 | to 1 | -0.298858 |
The lower right cell shows a house edge of 29.89%.
The final Lucky Ladies table shows the house edge according to the pay table and number of decks. Note that the top hands with pay table A and B are impossible with 1 deck.
| Lucky Ladies -- Summary | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Decks | Table A | Table B | Table C |
| 1 | 38.16% | 36.05% | 29.89% |
| 2 | 30.05% | 24.94% | 25.51% |
| 3 | 27.37% | 21.28% | 24.07% |
| 4 | 26.04% | 19.46% | 23.35% |
| 5 | 25.24% | 18.37% | 22.92% |
| 6 | 24.71% | 17.64% | 22.64% |
| 7 | 24.33% | 17.12% | 22.43% |
| 8 | 24.05% | 16.73% | 22.28% |
This is a simple pair of side bets that the player and/or dealer will get a blackjack. Wins pay 15 to 1. The player may bet on a player blackjac and/or dealer blackjack. If the player bets both and the player gets a blackjack composed of an ace and jack of spades, then the player will win a progressive bonus.
As the number of decks increases, the probability of ablackjack decreases, making the player's odds worse. The following table shows pertinent information about this betas explained below.
First column: Number of decks
Second column: House edge if just one bet is made
Third column: Overall reduction in house edge for each $100 in meter if both bets are made
Fourth column: Point meter must reach for bet to have zerohouse edge.
| Bonus Blackjack — Version 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Decks | House Edge | Reduction in House for each $100 in Meter |
Break-even Meter |
| 1 | 22.78% | 3.77% | $604.00 |
| 2 | 23.53% | 3.73% | $630.00 |
| 4 | 23.89% | 3.72% | $643.00 |
| 6 | 24.02% | 3.71% | $647.33 |
| 8 | 24.08% | 3.71% | $649.50 |
This is another side bet called "Bonus Blackjack." I noticed it at the Sycuan casino near San Diego on October 25, 2009. The only bet amounts permitted were 50¢ and $1. The following table shows the pay table, probabilities, and return for a six-deck game. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 40.78% (ouch!). This assumes the player always tries for a 678 or 777 if possible, even if it violates basic strategy. The cost of such strategy deviations are not indicated.
| Bonus Blackjack (Sycuan) — Six Decks | ||||
| Hand | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 777 | 500 | 12144 | 0.000404 | 0.201862 |
| 678 | 50 | 82944 | 0.002757 | 0.137873 |
| Suited BJ | 20 | 357120 | 0.011872 | 0.237447 |
| Loser | -1 | 29627712 | 0.984966 | -0.984966 |
| Total | 30079920 | 1 | -0.407784 | |
The next table shows the house edge for various number of decks.
| Bonus Blackjack (version 2) — House Edge | |
| Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 2 | 45.16% |
| 4 | 41.92% |
| 5 | 41.24% |
| 6 | 40.78% |
| 8 | 40.20% |
As the name implies this is a blackjack side bet with aprogressive jackpot. For an optional $1 the blackjack playermay see back $3 to the progressive jackpot, which starts at$25,000. I saw this side bet at the New York New York casinowhere they had three tables tied into the same progressive.On July 30, 2001, the jackpot meter was at $35537.36. Atthis time I was told they recently put it in place andnobody had hit the jackpot yet. On August 11 the meter hadrisen to $37746.28.
Just like in Caribbean Stud the player puts the $1 forthe Progressive side bet in a slot. Before dealing a newhand the dealer presses a button, the dollars vanish, and alight designates who made the bet. The following table showswhat each winning hand pays, the probability (based on sixdecks), and the contribution to the return.
The following table shows the return based on a meter of$35537.36, the amount the last time I observed it.
Progressive Blackjack | ||||
Hand | Permutations | Probability | Pays | Return |
4 red/black aces | 23760 | 0.000003 | 35537.36 | 0.090844 |
4 aces | 231264 | 0.000025 | 2000 | 0.049763 |
3 suited aces | 138240 | 0.000015 | 1000 | 0.014873 |
3 non-suited aces | 3359232 | 0.000361 | 200 | 0.072283 |
2 suited aces | 10679040 | 0.001149 | 50 | 0.057447 |
2 non-suited aces | 38444544 | 0.004136 | 15 | 0.062043 |
1 ace | 662100480 | 0.071234 | 3 | 0.213703 |
no aces | 8579718720 | 0.923077 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 9294695280 | 1 | 0 | 0.560955 |
The above table shows an expected return of 56.10% perdollar bet, or a house edge of 43.90%. The general formulafor the return is 47.01% plus 2.56% for each $10,000 in themeter. To have no house edge the meter would need to reach$207287.85. Also note there are no basic strategy deviationsfor this side bet. If the player gets two aces he shouldsplit anyway, which guarantees two more cards.
It is unclear to me what events cause the meter to go upand down. Sometimes the meter goes up by 28 cents for each$1 bet made. According to the Mikohn's web site the houseedge is 22%
.If this is the case then the meter contribution rate is24.60%. Mikohn also mentions that part of each dollar goesto a higher reseed of the next jackpot. So 24.60% would bedivided between the current meter and the next one. Based onthis contribution rate the average jackpot when won would be$121,225.86.
Mikohn, the owners of this side bet, keep a list ofcasinos that offer this side bet >here
.
Twin blackjack is not a side bet, but a variation of the game of blackjack. I saw the game at the Stardust in August, 2001. Each position has two betting spots. If the player makes a bet in both of them he will play out two hands against the dealer's up card. In the event the player gets two blackjacks (called twin blackjacks) they both shall pay 2-1. If the player gets two identical blackjacks (called identical twin blackjacks) both shall pay 4-1.
The following table shows what this is worth to theplayer.
| Twin Blackjack | |||
| Event | Probability | Pays Extra | Return |
| Twin BJ | 0.002142 | 0.5 | 0.001071 |
Identical twin BJ | 0.000025 | 2.5 | 0.000062 |
| total | 0.002167 | 0 | 0.001133 |
The lower right cell in the table shows the twinblackjack rules add about 0.1133% to the players return.However as usual with novelty games you give more than youget back. In this case the player may NOT double after asplit and the number of splits per hand is lowered from 3 to2. Under the normal Stardust 6-deck rules the house edge is0.4066%. Under these rules, not including the twin blackjackbonuses, the house edge is 0.5527%. Overall the house edgeis 0.4394%, 0.0328% higher than the conventional rules.
Perfect Pairs is a blackjack side bet found in casinos in Australia, Macau, and London. It pays if the player's first two cards are a pair. The following table shows the specifics. A"perfect pair" is two identical cards (like two ace of spades). A "colored pair" is two cards of the same rank andcolor (like the ace of spades and ace of clubs). There are four pay tables that I am aware of, which are referred to as A to D below. The following four tables show how the odds of each pay table.
| Pay Table A — 8 decks | ||||
| Hand | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perfect pair | 25 | 1456 | 0.016867 | 0.421687 |
| Colored pair | 12 | 1664 | 0.019277 | 0.231325 |
| Red/black pair | 6 | 3328 | 0.038554 | 0.231325 |
| Non-pair | -1 | 79872 | 0.925301 | -0.925301 |
| Total | 86320 | 1 | -0.040964 | |
| Pay Table B — 8 decks | ||||
| Hand | Pays | Combintions | Probability | Retun |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perfect pair | 30 | 1456 | 0.016867 | 0.506024 |
| Colored pair | 10 | 1664 | 0.019277 | 0.192771 |
| Red/black pair | 5 | 3328 | 0.038554 | 0.192771 |
| Non-pair | -1 | 79872 | 0.925301 | -0.925301 |
| Total | 86320 | 1 | -0.033735 | |
| Pay Table C — 8 decks | ||||
| Hand | Pays | Combintions | Probability | Retun |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perfect pair | 25 | 1456 | 0.016867 | 0.421687 |
| Colored pair | 12 | 1664 | 0.019277 | 0.231325 |
| Red/black pair | 5 | 3328 | 0.038554 | 0.192771 |
| Non-pair | -1 | 79872 | 0.925301 | -0.925301 |
| Total | 86320 | 1 | -0.079518 | |
| Pay Table D — 8 decks | ||||
| Hand | Pays | Combintions | Probability | Retun |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perfect pair | 25 | 1456 | 0.016867 | 0.421687 |
| Colored pair | 15 | 1664 | 0.019277 | 0.289157 |
| Red/black pair | 5 | 3328 | 0.038554 | 0.192771 |
| Non-pair | -1 | 79872 | 0.925301 | -0.925301 |
| Total | 86320 | 1 | -0.021687 | |
The next table shows the expected return under all four pay tables, according to the number of decks.
| Perfect Pairs Expected Returns | ||||
| Decks | Pay Table A | Pay Table B | Pay Table C | Pay Table D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | -0.223301 | -0.252427 | -0.262136 | -0.203883 |
| 4 | -0.101449 | -0.106280 | -0.140097 | -0.082126 |
| 5 | -0.077220 | -0.077220 | -0.115830 | -0.057915 |
| 6 | -0.061093 | -0.057878 | -0.099678 | -0.041801 |
| 8 | -0.040964 | -0.033735 | -0.079518 | -0.021687 |
Bonanza Blackjack is a side bet found on a fullyelectronic 6-deck game at the Boulder Station in Las Vegas.If the player has any 20 (including a soft 20) and thedealer has a 10-point card the player will win something.This is a $1 side bet, no more and no less.
Bonanza Blackjack | |||||
Player's hand | Dealer's hand | Permutations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Same rank and suit | First two cards match | 5760 | 0.00000062 | 25000 | 0.015493 |
| Same rank and suit | Up card matches | 587520 | 0.00006321 | 2500 | 0.158026 |
| Same rank and suit | Up card any 10 | 13348800 | 0.00143617 | 100 | 0.143617 |
| Same rank | Up card any 10 | 50191488 | 0.00540001 | 30 | 0.162 |
| Same suit | Up card any 10 | 50191488 | 0.00540001 | 20 | 0.108 |
| Different rank and suit (including soft 20) | Up card any 10 | 184747392 | 0.01987665 | 10 | 0.198766 |
| Loser | 8995622832 | 0.96782332 | -1 | -0.967823 | |
| Total | 9294695280 | 1 | -0.18192 | ||
The lower right cell shows a house edge of 18.19%.
This is a simple pair of side bets I noticed at theCasablanca in Mesquite, Nevada. The player simply bets ifhis first card will be higher or lower than the dealer's upcard. In the event the two cards are the same rank, exceptaces, the tie shall go to the dealer. Two aces push. Thegame I saw it on was 6-decks but here is the house edge forall numbers of decks.
Hi/Low | |
Decks | House Edge |
1 | 5.43% |
2 | 6.27% |
3 | 6.55% |
4 | 6.69% |
5 | 6.77% |
6 | 6.83% |
7 | 6.87% |
8 | 6.9% |
2 Through 6 | ||||
Event | Permutations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Ace/king of hearts | 34560 | 0.001149 | 40 | 0.045958 |
| Blackjack | 518400 | 0.017234 | 8 | 0.137873 |
| Total of 9 to 11* | 1707888 | 0.056778 | 5 | 0.283892 |
| Total of 17 to 20 | 2957760 | 0.09833 | 2 | 0.19666 |
| Blackjack (dealer has 7 to A) | 875520 | 0.029106 | 2 | 0.058213 |
| All other | 23985792 | 0.797402 | -1 | -0.797402 |
| Total | 30079920 | 1 | 0 | -0.074807 |
*: includes soft 19 and soft 20
The maximum bet allowed is the lesser of $50 and the blackjack bet.
Jack Magic is a Shufflemaster side bet that has been seen at the Spirit Mountain casino in GrandeRonde, Oregon. It is played on a 5-deck blackjack game with a continuous shuffler. Wins are based on the player's initial two cards and the dealer's up card, thus no basic strategy changes are necessary. The following table shows the probability and return for each win. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 20.06%.
Jack Magic | ||||
Event | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Three one eyed jacks | 120 | 0.000041 | 500 | 0.020721 |
| Three jacks | 1020 | 0.000352 | 100 | 0.035226 |
| Two one eyed jacks | 10800 | 0.00373 | 30 | 0.111893 |
| Two jacks | 34800 | 0.012018 | 10 | 0.120182 |
| One one eyed jack | 286800 | 0.099046 | 2 | 0.198092 |
| One jack | 286800 | 0.099046 | 1 | 0.099046 |
| No jacks | 2275280 | 0.785766 | -1 | -0.785766 |
| Total | 2895620 | 1 | 0 | -0.200606 |
Match the Dealer is a side bet found in both blackjack and Spanish 21. The player wins for each of his initial two cards that match the dealer's up card. Matches in rank only pay less than a match in rank and suit. The following tables show the various versions I am aware of.
| Match the Dealer - Blackjack - Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two suited matches | 22 | 10 | 0.000207 | 0.004564 |
| One suited and one non-suited match | 15 | 90 | 0.001867 | 0.028005 |
| One suited match | 11 | 1440 | 0.029872 | 0.328597 |
| Two non-suited matches | 8 | 153 | 0.003174 | 0.025392 |
| One non-suited matches | 4 | 5184 | 0.107541 | 0.430163 |
| No matches | -1 | 41328 | 0.857338 | -0.857338 |
| Total | 48205 | 1 | -0.040618 | |
Match the Dealer - Blackjack - Eight Decks | ||||
| Event | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Two suited matches | 21 | 0.000244 | 28 | 0.006845 |
| One hard and one each match | 168 | 0.001956 | 17 | 0.033246 |
| Two non-suited matches | 276 | 0.003213 | 6 | 0.019277 |
| One suited match | 2688 | 0.03129 | 14 | 0.438065 |
| One non-suited match | 9216 | 0.107281 | 3 | 0.321844 |
| No matches | 73536 | 0.856015 | -1 | -0.856015 |
| Total | 85905 | 1 | 0 | -0.036738 |
Match the Dealer - Spanish 21 - Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Two suited matches | 10 | 0.000244 | 18 | 0.004386 |
| One hard and one each match | 90 | 0.002193 | 13 | 0.028508 |
| Two non-suited matches | 153 | 0.003728 | 8 | 0.029824 |
| One suited match | 1320 | 0.032163 | 9 | 0.289467 |
| One non-suited match | 4752 | 0.115787 | 4 | 0.463147 |
| No matches | 34716 | 0.845886 | -1 | -0.845886 |
| Total | 41041 | 1 | 0 | -0.030555 |
Match the Dealer - Spanish 21 - Eight Decks | ||||
| Event | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Two suited matches | 21 | 0.000287 | 24 | 0.00689 |
| One hard and one each match | 168 | 0.002297 | 15 | 0.034448 |
| Two non-suited matches | 276 | 0.003773 | 6 | 0.022637 |
| One suited match | 2464 | 0.033683 | 12 | 0.404194 |
| One non-suited match | 8448 | 0.115484 | 3 | 0.346452 |
| No matches | 61776 | 0.844477 | -1 | -0.844477 |
| Total | 73153 | 1 | 0 | -0.029855 |
Some casinos offer a simple side bet that pays from 15 to 19 to 1 for a player blackjack. It is also possible for the bet to be based on a dealer blackjack, or both bets may be available. The Cal Neva in Reno, where the picture above was taken, pays 17 to 1. There is no particular name for this and I think it is a "common domain" bet, meaning nobody owns the idea so no royalties are required.
The following table shows the house edge for 1 to 8 decks and a payoff of 15 to 19 to 1.
Blackjack Only | |||||
| Number of Decks | 15 to 1 | 16 to 1 | 17 to 1 | 18 to 1 | 19 to 1 |
| 1 deck | 22.78% | 17.95% | 13.12% | 8.30% | 3.47% |
| 2 decks | 23.53% | 18.75% | 13.97% | 9.19% | 4.41% |
| 3 decks | 23.77% | 19.01% | 14.24% | 9.48% | 4.71% |
| 4 decks | 23.89% | 19.14% | 14.38% | 9.62% | 4.87% |
| 5 decks | 23.97% | 19.22% | 14.46% | 9.71% | 4.96% |
| 6 decks | 24.02% | 19.27% | 14.52% | 9.77% | 5.02% |
| 7 decks | 24.05% | 19.3% | 14.56% | 9.81% | 5.06% |
| 8 decks | 24.08% | 19.33% | 14.59% | 9.84% | 5.10% |
Lucky Lucky is a side bet based on the player's first two cards and the dealer's up card. It can be found at various casinos in Las Vegas and Alberta, Canada. The following tables shows the various winning hands, probability, payoff, and contribution to the total return, based on a six deck game. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 2.66%, one of the lowest for any side bet.
Lucky Lucky — Six Decks | |||||
| Event | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return | |
| Suited 777 | 80 | 0.000016 | 200 | 0.003191 | |
| Suited 678 | 864 | 0.000172 | 100 | 0.017234 | |
| Unsuited 777 | 1944 | 0.000388 | 50 | 0.019388 | |
| Unsuited 678 | 12960 | 0.002585 | 30 | 0.077553 | |
| Suited 21 | 26568 | 0.005299 | 15 | 0.079492 | |
| Unsuited 21 | 406296 | 0.081043 | 3 | 0.24313 | |
| Any 20 | 377568 | 0.075313 | 2 | 0.150626 | |
| Any 19 | 364320 | 0.07267 | 2 | 0.145341 | |
| All other | 3822720 | 0.762513 | -1 | -0.762513 | |
| Total | 5013320 | 1 | -0.026556 | ||
Bonus Spin is a side bet in which the player gets to spin a wheel if he gets a blackjack. Also, a hand with at least one ace, but not a blackjack, pays 1 to 1. The prizes on the wheel are 5x, 15x, 25x, 20x, 10x, and 100x, where the x represents the bet amount. All wins are on a to one basis. Assuming all wins were equally likely the average win would be 29.17x, resulting in a player edge of 63.4%. Obviously the stops on the prize wheel where not equally weighted. I asked the table games manager what the average win was and he said it was right around 14. As the table below shows this results in a house edge of 8.63%, based on six decks.
| Bonus Spin - Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Blackjack | 2304 | 0.047489 | 14* | 0.664853 |
| Ace | 4884 | 0.100668 | 1 | 0.100668 |
| Loss | 41328 | 0.851843 | -1 | -0.851843 |
| Total | 48516 | 1 | -0.086322 | |
* Based on an estimated average win.
The next table shows the house edge for 1 to 8 decks, again assuming an average win of 14.
Bonus Spin | |
Decks | House Edge |
| 1 | 7.39% |
| 2 | 8.14% |
| 3 | 8.39% |
| 4 | 8.51% |
| 5 | 8.58% |
| 6 | 8.63% |
| 7 | 8.67% |
| 8 | 8.69% |
Similar to Bonus Spin this is $1 side bet on a blackjack. If the player wins he gets to spin a prize wheel. According to Scott Brynen the average win is about 15 to 1, based on personal observation. Casinos will often allow bets of larger than $1, with a win of the product of the prize wheel and the bet made. The following table shows the probability of winning and house edge according to the number of decks, assuming an average win of 15 to 1.
| House Edge in Wheel of Madness | ||
| Decks | Prob. Win | House Edge |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.83% | 22.78% |
| 2 | 4.78% | 23.53% |
| 3 | 4.76% | 23.77% |
| 4 | 4.76% | 23.89% |
| 5 | 4.75% | 23.97% |
| 6 | 4.75% | 24.02% |
| 7 | 4.75% | 24.05% |
| 8 | 4.75% | 24.08% |
This bet is vulnerable to card counting. Using indices of +1 for 2 to 9, 0 for 10-K, and -9 for aces, the odds swing in the player's favor at a true count (running count divided by decks remaining, rounding down) of 12. The next table shows how often this happens and the average advantage when it does in a 6-deck game according to the penetration, again assuming an average win of 15 to 1.
| Card Counting in Wheel of Madness | ||
| Penetration | Bets Made | Avg. Adv. |
|---|---|---|
| 75% | 3.58% | 10.72% |
| 80% | 4.46% | 12.36% |
| 85% | 5.49% | 14.69% |
| 90% | 6.43% | 16.79% |
Version 1 of this is a side bet I noticed at the MGM Grand on November 26, 2005. It was played on a six-deck game.
| High Tie Bonus Blackjack — Version 1 — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackjack tie | 50 | 20136960 | 0.002167 | 0.108325 |
| Suited blackjack | 15 | 105315840 | 0.011331 | 0.169961 |
| Suited pair | 10 | 149432400 | 0.016077 | 0.160772 |
| Blackjack | 6 | 315947520 | 0.033992 | 0.203953 |
| Pair | 3 | 537956640 | 0.057878 | 0.173633 |
| Other | -1 | 8165905920 | 0.878556 | -0.878556 |
| Total | 9294695280 | 1 | -0.061911 | |
Version 2 of this is a side bet I noticed at the Eldorado casino in Henderson on March 16, 2007. It was played on a six-deck game.
| High Tie Bonus Blackjack — Version 2 — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackjack tie | 25 | 20136960 | 0.002167 | 0.054163 |
| Suited pair | 6 | 149432400 | 0.016077 | 0.096463 |
| Suited blackjack | 4 | 105315840 | 0.011331 | 0.045323 |
| Blackjack | 3 | 315947520 | 0.033992 | 0.101977 |
| Pair | 2 | 537956640 | 0.057878 | 0.115756 |
| Suited | 1 | 2041476480 | 0.219639 | 0.219639 |
| Other | -1 | 6124429440 | 0.658917 | -0.658917 |
| Total | 9294695280 | 1 | -0.025597 | |
Field of Gold is a side bet I'm told can be found at the Spirit Mountain Casino in Grand Ronde, Oregon. All wins are based on the player's first two cards. For side bet purposes, aces always count as one. The following return table is based on six decks. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 5.66%.
| Field of Gold - Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ace/jack suited | 25 | 144 | 0.002968 | 0.074202 |
| Two aces | 10 | 276 | 0.005689 | 0.056888 |
| 3 or 4 total | 3 | 1428 | 0.029434 | 0.088301 |
| 9 or 10 total | 2 | 4884 | 0.100668 | 0.201336 |
| Any other blackjack | 1.5 | 2160 | 0.044521 | 0.066782 |
| 11 to 12 total | 1 | 6612 | 0.136285 | 0.136285 |
| All other | -1 | 33012 | 0.680435 | -0.680435 |
| Total | 48516 | 1 | -0.056641 | |
The following table shows the house edge for various numbers of decks.
| Field of Gold - House Edge | |
| Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 1 deck | 6.64% |
| 2 decks | 6.05% |
| 4 decks | 5.76% |
| 5 decks | 5.7% |
| 6 decks | 5.66% |
| 8 decks | 5.62% |
Automatic Win/Casino Surrender is an optional rule in blackjack in which the player may force the dealer to surrender when the player has a 2-card 20 against a dealer 10. This option is known by both names. In other words the player may play out his hand or settle for a win of 50% of his bet. The option may only be invoked after the dealer checks for blacjack. The Stardust in Las Vegas has been seen offering this rule in May 2005.
The following table shows the player's expected return with a 20 agaisnt a dealer 10, after the dealer checks for blackjack, according to the number of decks and composition of the 20.
| Expected value of 20 vs 10 | ||
| Decks | 10,10 | A,9 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58.5315% | 55.4551% |
| 2 | 56.8553% | 55.4572% |
| 4 | 56.1473% | 55.4561% |
| 5 | 56.0074% | 55.4558% |
| 6 | 55.9145% | 55.4555% |
| 8 | 55.7987% | 55.4551% |
The table shows the player always stands to win 55.46% to 58.53% of his bet by playing out the hand. In a typical 6-deck game the player will give up 5.91% of his bet with a 10,10 and 5.46% with an A,9 by invoking the surrender option. The bottom line is taking dealer surrender is a mistake and the player should go for the full win.
"Bust It" is a side bet seen at the Taj Majal in Atlanic City in April, 2007. In July 2010 I saw it at the Wynn in Las Vegas. The side bet can not exceed the lesser of the blackjack bet and $25. It wins if the dealer busts on the third card. The side bet is available on ordinary blackjack and Double Attack Blackjack, which uses a Spanish deck. It does not matter whether dealer hits or stands on soft 17, because either way busting with three cards is impossible on a two-card soft 17. Card counters may be interested to know that the dealer is more likely to bust when the count is high. So at some positive count the odds would swing to the player's favor.
The following return table is for ordinary blackjack with eight decks. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 6.814%.
| Bust It — Eight Ordinary Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited 888 | 200 | 672 | 0.000019 | 0.003761 |
| Colored 888 | 50 | 2688 | 0.000075 | 0.003761 |
| Bust on 6 | 15 | 175616 | 0.004914 | 0.073713 |
| Bust on 7 | 9 | 374272 | 0.010473 | 0.094258 |
| Bust on 8 | 7 | 582400 | 0.016297 | 0.11408 |
| Bust on 9 | 5 | 814080 | 0.02278 | 0.113900 |
| Bust on 10 | 3 | 4233216 | 0.118456 | 0.355369 |
| Loss | -1 | 29553536 | 0.826985 | -0.826985 |
| Total | 35736480 | 1.000000 | -0.068143 | |
The next table shows the house edge for the pay table above and rules above for one to eight decks.
| Bust It — Ordinary Decks | |
| Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 1 | 8.127% |
| 2 | 7.568% |
| 3 | 7.267% |
| 4 | 7.096% |
| 5 | 6.987% |
| 6 | 6.912% |
| 7 | 6.856% |
| 8 | 6.814% |
The following return table is for eight Spanish decks. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 8.006%.
| Bust It — Eight Spanish Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited 888 | 200 | 672 | 0.000024 | 0.004784 |
| Colored 888 | 50 | 2688 | 0.000096 | 0.004784 |
| Bust on 6 | 15 | 143872 | 0.005122 | 0.076825 |
| Bust on 7 | 10 | 308736 | 0.010991 | 0.109907 |
| Bust on 8 | 8 | 484096 | 0.017233 | 0.137866 |
| Bust on 9 | 6 | 683008 | 0.024314 | 0.145886 |
| Bust on 10 | 3 | 2683392 | 0.095526 | 0.286577 |
| Loss | -1 | 23784288 | 0.846695 | -0.846695 |
| Total | 28090752 | 1.000000 | -0.080064 | |
The next table shows the house edge for the pay table above and rules above for one to eight Spanish decks.
| Bust It — Spanish Decks | |
| Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 1 | 9.844% |
| 2 | 9.035% |
| 3 | 8.621% |
| 4 | 8.388% |
| 5 | 8.24% |
| 6 | 8.138% |
| 7 | 8.063% |
| 8 | 8.006% |
"Straight 8's" is a blackjack side bet seen in Calgary in March 2007. Like the Lucky Lucky, it pays based on the player's first two cards and the dealer's up card.
The following return table is based on six decks. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 2.696%.
| Straight 8's - Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three suited 8's | 200 | 80 | 0.000016 | 0.003191 |
| Three 8's | 50 | 1944 | 0.000388 | 0.019388 |
| 5,6,7 | 25 | 13824 | 0.002757 | 0.068936 |
| Three of a kind | 5 | 24288 | 0.004845 | 0.024223 |
| Pair of 8's | 3 | 79488 | 0.015855 | 0.047566 |
| 8, 18, or 28 | 2 | 472032 | 0.094156 | 0.188311 |
| Pair | 2 | 841248 | 0.167803 | 0.335605 |
| Loser | -1 | 3580416 | 0.714181 | -0.714181 |
| Total | 5013320 | 1.000000 | -0.026959 | |
The next table shows the house edge for the pay table above and rules above for one to eight decks.
| Straight 8's - House Edge | |
| Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 1 | 15.529% |
| 2 | 7.934% |
| 3 | 5.331% |
| 4 | 4.018% |
| 5 | 3.226% |
| 6 | 2.696% |
| 7 | 2.317% |
| 8 | 2.032% |
2 Run 21 is a blackjack side bet I noticed at the Silver Dollar casino in Seattle on June 5, 2007. It pays based on the player's first two cards, and the dealer's first two cards.
The following return table is based on six decks. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 10.236%.
| 2 Run 21 - Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two straight flushes | 40 | 3242668 | 0.001395 | 0.055820 |
| Straight flush and straight | 10 | 19445136 | 0.008368 | 0.083683 |
| Two straights | 8 | 29173140 | 0.012555 | 0.100438 |
| One straight flush | 3 | 147641008 | 0.063538 | 0.190613 |
| One straight | 1 | 442923024 | 0.190613 | 0.190613 |
| Loser | -1 | 1681248844 | 0.723530 | -0.723530 |
| Total | 2323673820 | 1.000000 | -0.102364 | |
The next table shows the house edge for the pay table above and rules above for one to eight decks.
| 2 Run 21 - House Edge | |
| Decks | House Edge |
|---|---|
| 1 deck | 4.82% |
| 2 decks | 8.13% |
| 3 decks | 9.19% |
| 4 decks | 9.72% |
| 5 decks | 10.03% |
| 6 decks | 10.24% |
| 7 decks | 10.38% |
| 8 decks | 10.50% |
In May 2008 I had an unconfirmed report that the above table is no longer the one in use. The writer claims the side bet is now based on only the player’s first two cards, and the dealer’s up card.
Winners Option is a side bet seen at the Las Vegas Hard Rock in August, 2007. In addition to playing blackjack normally, the player may bet on the dealer's hand. Unfortunately, you can't deliberately lose your own hand, in this case. If you bet on the dealer, as indicated on the table by a "D" arrow, then you must play according to the same rules as the dealer, never doubling or splitting, and hitting to hard 17 or soft 18. In the event both player and dealer bust, the bet will lose half.
I was not told how many decks were used, so I analyzed it by random simulation for all number of decks from one to eight. Here are the results. The right column shows the expected player loss. In a six-deck game, for example, the house edge would be 4.09%.
| Winners Option | |||||
| Decks | Win | Push | Lose Half | Lose All | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.411247 | 0.093653 | 0.082833 | 0.412267 | -0.042436 |
| 2 | 0.411339 | 0.095404 | 0.081857 | 0.411400 | -0.040989 |
| 3 | 0.411138 | 0.096031 | 0.081745 | 0.411086 | -0.040821 |
| 4 | 0.411057 | 0.096290 | 0.081677 | 0.410976 | -0.040757 |
| 5 | 0.4109 | 0.096461 | 0.081608 | 0.411031 | -0.040935 |
| 6 | 0.410856 | 0.096566 | 0.081632 | 0.410946 | -0.040905 |
| 7 | 0.410842 | 0.096684 | 0.081592 | 0.410882 | -0.040836 |
| 8 | 0.410875 | 0.096734 | 0.081575 | 0.410816 | -0.040729 |
21 to the River is a blackjack side bet I noticed at the Hard Rock in Las Vegas on March 27, 2008. The rules are as follows.
The first step to analyze this game is to determine the probability that the blackjack hand will bust, and if so, with what card. To answer this, I ran the following simulation. My simulation treats all 10-point cards the same way, so I divided that total between the four 10-point cards.
| Blackjack Events | |
| Event | Probability |
|---|---|
| Player busts with 6 | 0.003197 |
| Player busts with 7 | 0.006978 |
| Player busts with 8 | 0.012119 |
| Player busts with 9 | 0.017238 |
| Player busts with 10 | 0.023341 |
| Player busts with J | 0.023341 |
| Player busts with Q | 0.023341 |
| Player busts with K | 0.023341 |
| No bust | 0.867104 |
| Total | 1.000000 |
The total probability of busting comes to 13.29%. This is higher than other places on my site, which say it is 13.00%. This is because of the splitting rule.
The next table shows the probability of each poker hand, with six decks, according to the first card dealt in the hand.
| Six-Deck Poker Probabilities by First Card | |||||||||||||
| Poker Hand | A up | 2 up | 3 up | 4 up | 5 up | 6 up | 7 up | 8 up | 9 up | 10 up | J up | Q up | K up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five of a kind | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 | 0.000023 |
| Royal flush | 0.000003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000003 | 0.000003 | 0.000003 | 0.000003 |
| Straight flush | 0.000003 | 0.000007 | 0.00001 | 0.000014 | 0.000017 | 0.000017 | 0.000017 | 0.000017 | 0.000017 | 0.000014 | 0.00001 | 0.000007 | 0.000003 |
| Four of a kind | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 | 0.001668 |
| Full house | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 | 0.003653 |
| Flush | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 | 0.003516 |
| Straight | 0.001729 | 0.001729 | 0.002593 | 0.003458 | 0.004322 | 0.004322 | 0.004322 | 0.004322 | 0.004322 | 0.004322 | 0.003458 | 0.002593 | 0.001729 |
| Three of a kind | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 | 0.041826 |
| Two pair | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 | 0.065558 |
| Jacks or better | 0.25072 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.091171 | 0.25072 | 0.25072 | 0.25072 |
| All other | 0.6313 | 0.790849 | 0.789982 | 0.789114 | 0.788246 | 0.788246 | 0.788246 | 0.788246 | 0.788246 | 0.788246 | 0.629565 | 0.630432 | 0.6313 |
| Total | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
The next table combines the probability of each bust card, by the poker probabilities starting with that card.
| 21 to the River — Return Table | |||
| Event | Pays | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Royal flush | 500 | 0 | 0.000158 |
| Straight flush | 250 | 0.000001 | 0.000365 |
| Five of a kind | 100 | 0.000003 | 0.000308 |
| Four of a kind | 50 | 0.000222 | 0.011081 |
| Full house | 25 | 0.000485 | 0.012136 |
| Flush | 15 | 0.000467 | 0.007010 |
| Straight | 10 | 0.000453 | 0.004533 |
| Three of a kind | 5 | 0.005558 | 0.027792 |
| Two pair | 2 | 0.008712 | 0.017425 |
| Jacks or better | 0 | 0.023288 | 0.000000 |
| No bust | 0 | 0.867104 | 0.000000 |
| All other | -1 | 0.093704 | -0.093704 |
| Total | 1.000000 | -0.012895 | |
The lower right cell shows a house edge of 1.29%, per bet made. The probability of the bet resolving with a win or loss is 10.96%. The house edge, per bet resolved, is thus 1.29%/10.96% = 11.76%.
Buster Blackjack is a side bet I noticed at the Sycuan casino, near San Diego, on November 30, 2008. The bet wins if the dealer busts, the more cards it takes, the more the player wins. The following table shows the probabilities and return for a six-deck game, where the dealer hits a soft 17. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 6.21%.
| Buster Blackjack — Six Decks, Dealer Hits Soft 17 | |||
| Event | Pays | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bust with 8+ cards | 250 | 0.000012 | 0.002986 |
| Bust with 7 cards | 50 | 0.000214 | 0.010722 |
| Bust with 6 cards | 12 | 0.002638 | 0.031651 |
| Bust with 5 cards | 4 | 0.020473 | 0.08189 |
| Bust with 4 cards | 2 | 0.089392 | 0.178784 |
| Bust with 3 cards | 2 | 0.173032 | 0.346064 |
| Dealer doesn't bust | -1 | 0.714241 | -0.714241 |
| Total | 1.000000 | -0.062143 | |
The next table shows the return, according to the number of decks, and whether the dealer hits or stands on a soft 17.
| Buster Blackjack — Expected Return | ||
| Decks | Stand Soft 17 | Hit Soft 17 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.087690 | -0.068890 |
| 2 | -0.084766 | -0.065097 |
| 4 | -0.083066 | -0.062915 |
| 5 | -0.082707 | -0.062455 |
| 6 | -0.082462 | -0.062143 |
| 8 | -0.082153 | -0.061749 |
As long as I went to the trouble to analyze this bet, the next table shows a finer breakdown of the possible dealer outcomes in a six-deck game, and the dealer hits a soft 17.
| Possible Dealer Outcomes — Six Decks, Dealer Hits Soft 17 | |
| Event | Probability |
|---|---|
| Total of 17 | 0.133459 |
| Total of 18 | 0.141205 |
| Total of 19 | 0.135682 |
| Total of 20 | 0.181531 |
| Total of 21 | 0.0748744 |
| Blackjack | 0.0474895 |
| Bust with 3 cards | 0.173032 |
| Bust with 4 cards | 0.0893918 |
| Bust with 5 cards | 0.0204726 |
| Bust with 6 cards | 0.0026376 |
| Bust with 7 cards | 0.000214444 |
| Bust with 8 cards | 0.000011528 |
| Bust with 9 cards | 0.00000040805 |
| Bust with 10 cards | 0.00000000909509 |
| Bust with 11 cards | 0.00000000011986 |
| Bust with 12 cards | 0.000000000000824386 |
| Bust with 13 cards | 0.00000000000000222834 |
Super Split is a blackjack side bet I noticed at the Viejas casino in California on December 1, 2008. It was closed at the time, so I don't know the number of decks used. The following return table is based on a six-deck game. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 23.40%.
| Super Split — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two aces on original hand, with two face cards after splitting, all suited | 2500 | 9180 | 0.000004 | 0.009877 |
| Two aces on original hand, with two face cards after splitting | 200 | 696276 | 0.0003 | 0.059929 |
| Two aces on original hand, with one face card after splitting | 50 | 4769280 | 0.002052 | 0.102624 |
| Two aces | 25 | 7744284 | 0.003333 | 0.083319 |
| Two identical face cards | 15 | 8621100 | 0.00371 | 0.055652 |
| Ace plus face card | 6 | 82762560 | 0.035617 | 0.213703 |
| Two face cards | 3 | 113798520 | 0.048974 | 0.146921 |
| All other | -1 | 2105272620 | 0.90601 | -0.90601 |
| Total | 2323673820 | 0 | -0.233987 | |
The next table shows the return, according to the number of decks.
| Super Split — Exected Return | |
| Decks | Return |
|---|---|
| 2 | -0.277397 |
| 4 | -0.244818 |
| 5 | -0.238317 |
| 6 | -0.233987 |
| 8 | -0.228577 |
Lucky Pairs is a side bet that wins if the player’s first two cards are a pair. Many baccarat tables also offer this bet. I understand it can be found in blackjack at some casinos in South Africa, where they pay 11 to 1. I do not know the number of decks used there.
The following table shows the house edge for 1 to 8 decks and various wins.
| Lucky Pairs | |||
| Decks | Pays | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 0.058824 | -0.058824 |
| 1 | 14 | 0.058824 | -0.117647 |
| 1 | 13 | 0.058824 | -0.176471 |
| 1 | 12 | 0.058824 | -0.235294 |
| 1 | 11 | 0.058824 | -0.294118 |
| 2 | 13 | 0.067961 | -0.048544 |
| 2 | 12 | 0.067961 | -0.116505 |
| 2 | 11 | 0.067961 | -0.184466 |
| 3 | 12 | 0.070968 | -0.077419 |
| 3 | 11 | 0.070968 | -0.148387 |
| 4 | 12 | 0.072464 | -0.057971 |
| 4 | 11 | 0.072464 | -0.130435 |
| 5 | 12 | 0.073359 | -0.046332 |
| 5 | 11 | 0.073359 | -0.119691 |
| 6 | 12 | 0.073955 | -0.038585 |
| 6 | 11 | 0.073955 | -0.11254 |
| 7 | 12 | 0.07438 | -0.033058 |
| 7 | 11 | 0.07438 | -0.107438 |
| 8 | 12 | 0.074699 | -0.028916 |
| 8 | 11 | 0.074699 | -0.103614 |
If d is the number of decks, the probability of a pair is (4*d-1)/(52*d-1).
| Kings Bounty — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 King of Spades + Dealer BJ | 1000 | 33840 | 0.000015 | 0.014563 |
| 2 King of Spades | 100 | 684585 | 0.000295 | 0.029461 |
| 2 Suited Kings | 30 | 2155275 | 0.000928 | 0.027826 |
| 2 Suited 10, Jack, or Queens | 20 | 8621100 | 0.00371 | 0.074202 |
| Suited 20 | 9 | 48278160 | 0.020777 | 0.18699 |
| 2 Kings | 6 | 10345320 | 0.004452 | 0.026713 |
| Unsuited 20 | 4 | 175870440 | 0.075686 | 0.302745 |
| Loser | -1 | 2077685100 | 0.894138 | -0.894138 |
| Total | 2323673820 | 1 | -0.231637 | |
The next table shows the house edge for various numbers of decks, assuming no change in the pay table.
| Kings Bounty — House Edge | |
| Decks | Return |
|---|---|
| 8 | -0.224693 |
| 6 | -0.231637 |
| 5 | -0.2372 |
| 4 | -0.245555 |
| 2 | -0.28754 |
"Perfect Charlie" is a side bet seen at the Fort McDowell casino in Arizona. Here are the rules.
| Perfect Charlie — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,3,4,5,7 suited in order | 300000 | 31104 | 0.0000000109 | 0.0032595048 |
| 2,3,4,5 suited in order | 80000 | 1565568 | 0.0000005469 | 0.0437497978 |
| 2,3,4,5,7 suited any order | 40000 | 3701376 | 0.0000012929 | 0.0517174762 |
| 2,3,4,5,7 unsuited in order | 20000 | 7838208 | 0.000002738 | 0.0547596807 |
| 2,3,4,5 suited any order | 4000 | 36008064 | 0.0000125781 | 0.0503122675 |
| 2,3,4 suited in order | 2000 | 80227584 | 0.0000280245 | 0.0560489959 |
| 2,3,4,5 unsuited in order | 1000 | 88335360 | 0.0000308566 | 0.0308566455 |
| 2,3,4 suited any order | 300 | 403004160 | 0.0001407744 | 0.0422323172 |
| 2,3,4,5,7 unsuited any order | 200 | 937039104 | 0.0003273195 | 0.0654638944 |
| 2,3,4 unsuited in order | 150 | 1130163840 | 0.0003947804 | 0.0592170535 |
| 2,3,4,5 unsuited any order | 100 | 2111215104 | 0.0007374738 | 0.0737473826 |
| 2,3,4 unsuited any order | 40 | 5650819200 | 0.0019739018 | 0.0789560713 |
| Loser | 0 | 2852316197568 | 0.9963497023 | 0 |
| Total | 2862766146240 | 1 | 0.6103210873 | |
The lower right cell shows a return of 61.03%, for a house edge of 38.97% (ouch!).
. A reader wrote me that it was seen at the Sandia Resort & Casino in Albuquerque, New Mexico in April 2011.
The side bet plays like Red Dog. Here are the specific rules.
The following table shows a house edge of 3.40% with six decks.
| In Between — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trips | 30 | 157872 | 0.005248 | 0.157453 |
| Spread 1 | 12 | 304128 | 0.010111 | 0.121328 |
| Spread 2 | 6 | 552960 | 0.018383 | 0.110298 |
| Spread 3 | 4 | 746496 | 0.024817 | 0.099268 |
| Spread 4+ | 1 | 6303744 | 0.209567 | 0.209567 |
| Loss | -1 | 22014720 | 0.731874 | -0.731874 |
| Total | 30079920 | 1 | -0.033961 | |
The next table shows the house edge according to the number of decks.
| In Between — House Edge | ||||
| Decks | House Edge | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.34% | |||
| 2 | 5.70% | |||
| 4 | 4.01% | |||
| 5 | 3.64% | |||
| 6 | 3.40% | |||
| 8 | 3.08% | |||
Another analysis of this bet, based on eight decks, can be found at miplet's blackjack side bet docs
.
The 3 Card Hard Hand is a side bet I noticed at the Boulder Station in Las Vegas on September 16, 2010. Much like the Lucky Lucky, it pays based on the player's first two cards and the dealer's up card. Aces may count as 1 or 11 points. The following table shows the pay table, probability of each win, and contribution to the total return, based on a six-deck game. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 4.27%.
| 3 Card Hard Hand — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suited 21 | 27512 | 27512 | 0.005488 | 0.137200 |
| Unsuited 21 | 421200 | 421200 | 0.084016 | 0.168032 |
| 17-20 | 1410056 | 1410056 | 0.281262 | 0.281262 |
| Loser | 3154552 | 3154552 | 0.629234 | -0.629234 |
| Total | -0.042745 | -0.042745 | 0.000000 | -0.042740 |
The next table shows the house edge according to the number of decks.
| 3 Card Hard Hand — House Edge | ||||
| Decks | House Edge | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.87% | |||
| 2 | 4.13% | |||
| 3 | 4.21% | |||
| 4 | 4.24% | |||
| 5 | 4.26% | |||
| 6 | 4.27% | |||
| 7 | 4.28% | |||
| 8 | 4.29% | |||
The Block bet is based on the player's first two cards and the dealer's up card. As of this writing (Nov. 2010) it can be found in South Africa, Egypt, Latvia, Estonia, Ireland, and Morocco. The bet wins if the dealer's up card matches the suit of one of the player's cards, and the player's card is higher. There are higher pays if the player's cards are a pair, suited, or both. Here is how the various winning hands are defined.
Here are return tables for 2, 6, and 8 decks. The pay tables were provided to me by the game maker.
| Block — Two Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate Block® | 60 | 1,248 | 0.001142 | 0.068532 |
| Pair Block® | 10 | 14,976 | 0.013706 | 0.137065 |
| Flush Block® | 5 | 39,104 | 0.035789 | 0.178945 |
| Normal Block® | 2 | 179,712 | 0.164477 | 0.328955 |
| Push | 0 | 18,720 | 0.017133 | 0.000000 |
| Loser | -1 | 838,864 | 0.767752 | -0.767752 |
| Total | 0 | 1,092,624 | 1.000000 | -0.054255 |
| Block — Six Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate Block® | 35 | 56,160 | 0.001867 | 0.065346 |
| Pair Block® | 10 | 404,352 | 0.013443 | 0.134426 |
| Flush Block® | 5 | 1,100,736 | 0.036594 | 0.182969 |
| Normal Block® | 2 | 4,852,224 | 0.161311 | 0.322622 |
| Push | 0 | 848,640 | 0.028213 | 0.000000 |
| Loser | -1 | 22,817,808 | 0.758573 | -0.758573 |
| Total | 0 | 30,079,920 | 1.000000 | -0.053210 |
| Block — Eight Decks | ||||
| Event | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate Block® | 35 | 139,776 | 0.001956 | 0.068448 |
| Pair Block® | 10 | 958,464 | 0.013410 | 0.134102 |
| Flush Block® | 5 | 2,622,464 | 0.036692 | 0.183458 |
| Normal Block® | 2 | 11,501,568 | 0.160922 | 0.321844 |
| Push | 0 | 2,114,112 | 0.029579 | 0.000000 |
| Loser | -1 | 54,136,576 | 0.757441 | -0.757441 |
| Total | 0 | 71,472,960 | 1.000000 | -0.049590 |
The next table shows the pay tables available for 1 to 8 decks and the house edge.
| Block — Eight Decks | |||||
| Decks | Normal Block | Flush Block | Pair Block | Ultimate Block | House Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 15 to 1 | N/A | 5.88% |
| 2 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 10 to 1 | 60 to 1 | 5.43% |
| 3 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 10 to 1 | 50 to 1 | 4.52% |
| 4 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 10 to 1 | 40 to 1 | 5.21% |
| 5 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 10 to 1 | 35 to 1 | 5.61% |
| 6 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 10 to 1 | 35 to 1 | 5.32% |
| 7 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 10 to 1 | 35 to 1 | 5.11% |
| 8 | 2 to 1 | 5 to 1 | 10 to 1 | 35 to 1 | 4.96% |
More information is available about this bet at the casinoholdempoker.com
.
The Hit and Run is a progressive side bet I first noticed at the Suncoast in Las Vegas on November 3, 2011. It is a $1 bet that pays if the dealer gets a blackjack or at least five cards. For purposes of the total dealer cards, all cards count, including a bust card, if there was one.
To analyze this bet I first looked at the probability of each possible event, by the number of decks. The following two tables show those probabilities, according to whether the dealer hits or stands on a soft 17.
| Hit and Run Probabilities — Dealer Hits on Soft 17 | ||||||
| Event | 1 deck | 2 decks | 4 decks | 5 decks | 6 decks | 8 decks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8+ cards | 0.00000553 | 0.00001250 | 0.00001759 | 0.00001875 | 0.00001956 | 0.00002060 |
| 7 cards | 0.00019242 | 0.00028462 | 0.00033818 | 0.00034948 | 0.00035712 | 0.00036680 |
| 6 cards | 0.00345798 | 0.00408065 | 0.00439796 | 0.00446180 | 0.00450443 | 0.00455777 |
| 5 cards | 0.03434820 | 0.03581484 | 0.03652738 | 0.03666828 | 0.03676193 | 0.03687865 |
| BJ | 0.04826546 | 0.04779686 | 0.04756596 | 0.04752005 | 0.04748949 | 0.04745134 |
| Loss | 0.91373042 | 0.91201053 | 0.91115293 | 0.91098163 | 0.91086748 | 0.91072483 |
| Hit and Run Probabilities — Dealer Stands on Soft 17 | ||||||
| Event | 1 deck | 2 decks | 4 decks | 5 decks | 6 decks | 8 decks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8+ cards | 0.00000399 | 0.00000882 | 0.00001238 | 0.00001320 | 0.00001377 | 0.00001451 |
| 7 cards | 0.00015154 | 0.00022623 | 0.00027019 | 0.00027951 | 0.00028582 | 0.00029381 |
| 6 cards | 0.00298450 | 0.00354247 | 0.00382789 | 0.00388539 | 0.00392379 | 0.00397187 |
| 5 cards | 0.03168991 | 0.03307633 | 0.03375033 | 0.03388366 | 0.03397228 | 0.03408275 |
| BJ | 0.04826546 | 0.04779686 | 0.04756596 | 0.04752005 | 0.04748949 | 0.04745134 |
| Loss | 0.91690461 | 0.91534928 | 0.91457324 | 0.91441819 | 0.91431485 | 0.91418571 |
The next two tables show the returns for all non-progressive wins. All wins are on a "for one" basis, meaning the player does not keep his original bet if he wins. The table below shows, for example, that in a two-deck game, where the dealer hits a soft 17, the non-progressive wins return 57.24%.
| Hit and Run Returns — Dealer Hits on Soft 17 | |||||||
| Event | Pays | 1 deck | 2 decks | 4 decks | 5 decks | 6 decks | 8 decks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 cards | 100 | 0.01924185 | 0.02846213 | 0.03381830 | 0.03494830 | 0.03571243 | 0.03667967 |
| 6 cards | 25 | 0.08644947 | 0.10201621 | 0.10994908 | 0.11154508 | 0.11261064 | 0.11394429 |
| 5 cards | 7 | 0.24043741 | 0.25070388 | 0.25569165 | 0.25667798 | 0.25733348 | 0.25815057 |
| BJ | 4 | 0.19306184 | 0.19118745 | 0.19026384 | 0.19008019 | 0.18995795 | 0.18980538 |
| Loss | 0 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
| Total | 0.53919057 | 0.57236967 | 0.58972287 | 0.59325155 | 0.59561450 | 0.59857990 | |
| Hit and Run Returns — Dealer Stands on Soft 17 | |||||||
| Event | Pays | 1 deck | 2 decks | 4 decks | 5 decks | 6 decks | 8 decks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 cards | 100 | 0.01515360 | 0.02262332 | 0.02701911 | 0.02795094 | 0.02858187 | 0.02938144 |
| 6 cards | 25 | 0.07461250 | 0.08856179 | 0.09569721 | 0.09713469 | 0.09809477 | 0.09929678 |
| 5 cards | 7 | 0.22182935 | 0.23153433 | 0.23625234 | 0.23718563 | 0.23780594 | 0.23857923 |
| BJ | 4 | 0.19306184 | 0.19118745 | 0.19026384 | 0.19008019 | 0.18995795 | 0.18980538 |
| Loss | 0 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
| Total | 0.50465729 | 0.53390689 | 0.54923250 | 0.55235145 | 0.55444054 | 0.55706282 | |
The next two tables show how much the return increases per $10,000 in the meter, as well as the "breakeven-point," which is how high the meter would need to reach to have a 100% return, for a statistically fair bet.
| Hit and Run Value per $10,000 in Meter and Breakeven Point — Dealer Hit on Soft 17 | ||||||
| Metric | 1 deck | 2 decks | 4 decks | 5 decks | 6 decks | 8 decks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return per $10000 in meter | 0.05526440 | 0.12496464 | 0.17587273 | 0.18753475 | 0.19559878 | 0.206010727 |
| Breakeven | $83,382.68 | $34,220.11 | $23,328.07 | $21,689.23 | $20,674.23 | $19,485.40 |
| Hit and Run Value per $10,000 in Meter and Breakeven Point — Dealer Stands on Soft 17 | ||||||
| Metric | 1 deck | 2 decks | 4 decks | 5 decks | 6 decks | 8 decks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return per $10000 in meter | 0.03989356 | 0.08816667 | 0.12381517 | 0.13203645 | 0.13773304 | 0.145102266 |
| Breakeven | $124,166.07 | $52,865.00 | $36,406.48 | $33,903.41 | $32,349.50 | $30,525.86 |
When I saw this bet at the Suncoast it was on a two-deck game, where the dealer hits a soft 17. The meter on November 3, 2011 was at $8,888.44. Thus, the return at the time was 0.53919057 + (8888.44/10000)×0.124964643 = 68.34%.
Bet the Bust is a side bet I noticed at the Palace Station on December 29, 2011. The bet is offered after the initial two cards are dealt to each player and the dealer, with one dealer up card exposed, as usual. If the dealer's exposed card is a 10 or ace the dealer checks for blackjack before offering the Bet the Bust wager.
The Bet the Bust pays if the dealer busts. The probability of the dealer busting depends on his up card, thus so do the odds.
At the Palace Station the table with this side bet used six decks and the dealer hit a soft 17. The following table shows what the Bet the Bust paid, the probability of winning, and the expected return, according to the dealer's up card. The right column shows the lowest house edge is on the 8 at 2.52%.
| Bet the Bust -- Six Decks -- Dealer Hits Soft 17 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Up Card | Pays | Probability | Expected Return |
| A | 3.5 | 0.201281 | -0.094236 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 0.356661 | -0.108348 |
| 3 | 1.5 | 0.376958 | -0.057605 |
| 4 | 1 | 0.398470 | -0.203060 |
| 5 | 1 | 0.419632 | -0.160736 |
| 6 | 1 | 0.439259 | -0.121482 |
| 7 | 2.5 | 0.261936 | -0.083224 |
| 8 | 3 | 0.243693 | -0.025228 |
| 9 | 3 | 0.229242 | -0.083032 |
| 10 | 3 | 0.230239 | -0.079044 |
The next table shows the probability of the dealer busting according to the number of decks, assuming the dealer hits on a soft 17.
| Dealer Bust Probability -- Dealer Hits on Soft 17 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up Card | 1 Deck | 2 Decks | 3 Decks | 4 Decks | 5 Decks | 6 Decks | 7 Decks | 8 Decks |
| A | 0.204574 | 0.202556 | 0.201912 | 0.201595 | 0.201406 | 0.201281 | 0.201192 | 0.201125 |
| 2 | 0.356345 | 0.356527 | 0.356593 | 0.356627 | 0.356647 | 0.356661 | 0.356670 | 0.356677 |
| 3 | 0.378075 | 0.377460 | 0.377218 | 0.377090 | 0.377011 | 0.376958 | 0.376920 | 0.376891 |
| 4 | 0.405796 | 0.401328 | 0.399887 | 0.399176 | 0.398751 | 0.398470 | 0.398269 | 0.398119 |
| 5 | 0.429961 | 0.423668 | 0.421634 | 0.420629 | 0.420030 | 0.419632 | 0.419348 | 0.419136 |
| 6 | 0.437756 | 0.438754 | 0.439022 | 0.439144 | 0.439214 | 0.439259 | 0.439291 | 0.439314 |
| 7 | 0.259854 | 0.261143 | 0.261546 | 0.261742 | 0.261859 | 0.261936 | 0.261990 | 0.262031 |
| 8 | 0.238627 | 0.241630 | 0.242656 | 0.243173 | 0.243485 | 0.243693 | 0.243842 | 0.243954 |
| 9 | 0.233442 | 0.230898 | 0.230066 | 0.229653 | 0.229406 | 0.229242 | 0.229125 | 0.229037 |
| 10 | 0.232499 | 0.231144 | 0.230692 | 0.230465 | 0.230329 | 0.230239 | 0.230174 | 0.230125 |
The next table shows the expected return according to the number of decks, assuming the dealer hits on a soft 17, and the same pay table as at the Palace Station, indicated above.
| Expected Return -- Dealer Hits on Soft 17 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up Card | 1 Deck | 2 Decks | 3 Decks | 4 Decks | 5 Decks | 6 Decks | 7 Decks | 8 Decks |
| A | -0.079417 | -0.088498 | -0.091396 | -0.092823 | -0.093673 | -0.094236 | -0.094636 | -0.094938 |
| 2 | -0.109138 | -0.108683 | -0.108518 | -0.108433 | -0.108383 | -0.108348 | -0.108325 | -0.108308 |
| 3 | -0.054813 | -0.056350 | -0.056955 | -0.057275 | -0.057473 | -0.057605 | -0.057700 | -0.057773 |
| 4 | -0.188408 | -0.197344 | -0.200226 | -0.201648 | -0.202498 | -0.203060 | -0.203462 | -0.203762 |
| 5 | -0.140078 | -0.152664 | -0.156732 | -0.158742 | -0.159940 | -0.160736 | -0.161304 | -0.161728 |
| 6 | -0.124488 | -0.122492 | -0.121956 | -0.121712 | -0.121572 | -0.121482 | -0.121418 | -0.121372 |
| 7 | -0.090511 | -0.086000 | -0.084589 | -0.083903 | -0.083494 | -0.083224 | -0.083035 | -0.082891 |
| 8 | -0.045492 | -0.033480 | -0.029376 | -0.027308 | -0.026060 | -0.025228 | -0.024632 | -0.024184 |
| 9 | -0.066232 | -0.076408 | -0.079736 | -0.081388 | -0.082376 | -0.083032 | -0.083500 | -0.083852 |
| 10 | -0.070004 | -0.075424 | -0.077232 | -0.078140 | -0.078684 | -0.079044 | -0.079304 | -0.079500 |
It is not difficult to see that this side bet would be very countable. However, for now, you're on your own with that.
I have an unconfirmed report that this side bet was seen at Freddie's Club in Fife, Washington in February, 2012. It is a side bet that the player will bust on the next card. The bet may be made on player totals of 12 to 16. The odds a winning bet pays depends on the player's total as shown in the table below.
The following table shows the pertinent information for Bust Me, based on a two deck game. This table assumes the player makes this bet only on his original two cards.
| Bust Me — Two Decks | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Player Total | Pays | Probability | Expected Return |
| 12 | 2 | 0.308453 | -0.074642 |
| 13 | 1.5 | 0.385154 | -0.037115 |
| 14 | 1 | 0.461451 | -0.077099 |
| 15 | 0.5 | 0.537582 | -0.193627 |
| 16 | 0.5 | 0.607843 | -0.088235 |
The next table shows the house edge according to the player's total and number of decks.
| Bust Me — House Edge for One to Eight Decks | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player Total | 1 Deck | 2 Decks | 4 Decks | 5 Decks | 6 Decks | 8 Decks |
| 12 | 7.25% | 7.46% | 7.58% | 7.60% | 7.61% | 7.63% |
| 13 | 3.57% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.79% | 3.80% | 3.81% |
| 14 | 7.76% | 7.71% | 7.70% | 7.70% | 7.69% | 7.69% |
| 15 | 19.50% | 19.36% | 19.30% | 19.28% | 19.27% | 19.26% |
| 16 | 10.00% | 8.82% | 8.25% | 8.14% | 8.06% | 7.97% |
It is not difficult to see that this side bet would be vulnerable to card counters. I'll leave that as an exercise for the readers (I hate it when people say that!).
I noticed this side bet at Arizona Charlie's on Decatur on February 23, 2012. It is a pair of bets, mostly paying based on the color of the dealer's up card. However, there are exceptions for kings, queens, and threes. The following two return tables show the odds of all possible outcomes. The number of decks does not matter.
| Cowboys | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Pays | Cards | Probability | Expected Return |
| Red Queen or King | 1.5 | 4 | 0.076923 | 0.115385 |
| Any other red, except 3 | 1 | 20 | 0.384615 | 0.384615 |
| Black or 3 | -1 | 28 | 0.538462 | -0.538462 |
| Total | 52 | 1.000000 | -0.038462 | |
| Cowgirls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Pays | Cards | Probability | Expected Return |
| Black King or Queen | 1.5 | 4 | 0.076923 | 0.115385 |
| Any other black, except 3 | 1 | 20 | 0.384615 | 0.384615 |
| Red or 3 | -1 | 28 | 0.538462 | -0.538462 |
| Total | 52 | 1.000000 | -0.038462 | |

If you are interested in the analysis of blackjack side bets, please see my Gaming Math course notes on that topic. Here are some links.
Go back to blackjack
Copyright © 1998-2012 Wizard of Odds Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. • About | Privacy & Terms | Site Map | Links | Contact
The Wizard’s other sites: Wizard of Vegas | Wizard of Macau | Math Problems • Recommended: Vegas Click