|
|
|
Reason #5 why the Wizard likes Bodog:
Intelligent Bonuses
Many online casinos offer huge signup bonuses, but there's a catch. Buried in the fine print is that play on the most popular games doesn't count towards earning the bonus. It's common for blackjack, roulette, baccarat, craps, and Jacks or Better to be excluded. Sometimes everything except slots.
And that's if you can even find the terms and conditions. Many casinos put their 100% bonus in big flaming letters but make you hunt all over the site to find the rules.
But Bodog allows play on all games to count towards the wagering requirement. It's that simple. Just no opposite betting. All casinos ought to be as easy as Bodog about this. The bonus offer itself is simple too: on your first deposit, they'll give you an extra 10%. If you deposit $100, you'll wind up with $110 in chips or tokens.
Finally, in the unlikely event that Bodog feels you've been abusing their bonuses they won't seize your winnings, like some other casinos. In the worst case scenario they will politely tell you that they will not be offering you any future bonuses but you are welcome to keep playing and keep everything you have made already. (Visit Bodog)
Try Bodog's blackjack game. One click and you're in:
 No popups, no download, no registration, no B.S., just the game.
|
|
|
|
How
much to tip for video poker
handpays
The topic of this article is tipping
on hand pays in video poker. This advice
also applies to tipping in slots, video keno,
and any other electronic game. You may have
heard it said that the standard policy is to tip
1% to 2% for hand pays. I'm taking a stand that
this is way too much. If forced to give a
range I would say 0.5% to 1%.
The source of the "1% to 2%" range seems to
be Casino Player and Strictly Slots magazines,
the former of which I used to write for. Until
recently, I always followed this advice, thinking
it was set in stone, like tipping 15% to 20% in
restaurants. However, I now believe this to only
be the opinion of the editorial staff with
Casino Player and Strictly Slots. Every video
poker player I asked, and I know some big
players, tip much less.
My concern started when I recently read
Bob Dancer's novel Sex,
Lies, and Video Poker. In the middle the
book, Annie, a perfect playing professional
player, is training her boyfriend on 9/6 Jacks
or Better. He hits his first W2G win, a four of
a kind on a $25 bet for a $1250 return. When
asked how much he should tip she says, on page
186, "Ten bucks feels about right for a jackpot
of this size." In the rest of the book and the
sequel the tipping remains along these lines. I
was aghast when I read this. Either Dancer's
character, whose experiences are obviously based
on Dancer's own, was undertipping or I had been
overtipping all along. I asked several other big
video poker players, and while they each had a
different opinion they all agreed that 1% to 2%
was way too much. So now I feel like a fool,
probably having overtipped by about $1000 up to
this point.
So where do I get the 0.5% to 1%
range? The only person who I could get
to give me specific percentages was Jean Scott,
the "Queen of Comps." When I told her I once
tipped $200 on a $8000 jackpot she gasped "Oh my
god!" Most other players I asked gave long
wordy answers that seemed to come down to that
they had no standard policy, but took every W2G
win ($1200 or more) on a case by case basis.
However when pressed for examples I would say
that if anything 0.5% to 1% is too high. Many
pointed out that when playing a high
denomination game where $1200 or higher wins are
frequent that no tip is required except on
exceptionally large jackpots. So the 0.5% to 1%
should be attributed to Jean Scott, with myself
seconding the motion.
On a percentage of bet basis the cost of
tipping will depend a lot on game selection and
denomination. In general you will take a big
hit if fairly common hands result in a win of
$1200 or more. Let's look at jacks or better,
for example. Assume you tip 1% on a royal and
0.5% on any other handpay. Here is the cost of
tipping according to the denomination
played.
|
Denomination
|
Increase in house edge
from tipping
|
|
$0.50
|
0.020%
|
|
$1.00
|
0.020%
|
|
$2.00
|
0.020%
|
|
$5.00
|
0.025%
|
|
$10.00
|
0.084%
|
Notice how the percentage skyrockets at the
$10 level. That is because on a $50 bet
(remember you bet five coins) a four of a kind
will pay $1250. That happens once every 423
hands. For this reason I think it would be
forgivable to not tip every four of a kind for
an extended sitting.
My
gambling adventures
Speaking of video poker I have been
hot lately! I think I wrote about this
in an old newsletter but the Treasure Island
gave me $300 in free play in May. On my fifth
hand at a $2 3-play game I hit an $8000 royal.
Then in August the Treasure Island ran a free
cruise promotion for earning 150,000 points, or
running through $450,000 in action. This was on
top of double shopping points in August. The
play, cash back, and shopping points alone were
a 100.1% game. The cruise was the icing on the
cake, making it playable. $450,000 in action at
$10 a hand meant 45,000 hands to be played,
which I did ten at a time on a ten-play game. A
royal comes along once every 40,388 hands on
average, for an expected 1.1142 royals. I hit
four! The probability of hitting exactly
four with that much play is 2.1%.
Speaking of the cruise I just got some bad news today. The Treasure Island has decided, at least for now, to not honor their deal. I've been told the cruise was sold out and I'm on a waiting list for cancelations. However when I called Princess Cruises about the exact cruise in question they said there was plenty of room. This fight is just getting started! I'll keep you posted.
Also in August the New York New York ran a
double points promotion. Normally the cash
back is 1/3 of 1% at all the MGM/Mirage casinos,
however the NY NY doubled it in the form of free
play throughout the month. That resulted in a
player advantage of 0.43%, which for video poker
is very strong. Unfortunately I didn't learn of
this until about August 20th, but after I did I
played it four times. My game of preference was
the $5 five-play, 9/6 Jacks or Better. I laid
off 25% of the action to a friend because it was
a bit outside of my bankroll. By August 28 the
word of the promotion had started to spread.
When I arrived in the high limit room every
single multi-play game was taken, many of which
were being hogged by people using two games each
(a practice I find very annoying). I
griped about this to the woman who did the W2G
paperwork and asked to be told if a multi-play
game opened up. Meanwhile I settled on a $10
single-play game. The $50 bet per hand made it
not really worth my time but I hoped a
multi-play game would become free. About 90
minutes into my sitting, which was going
uneventfully, I was dealt four to a royal. The
probability of hitting the royal in such a case
is only 1 in 47. I've drawn to four to a
royals many times before but never on a $50 bet,
for a $40,000 jackpot. However I had to hit the
button eventually so I did, hoping for the jack
of diamonds, but expecting nothing. I got the
jack of diamonds! It is hard to explain
the feeling. At a win of $40,000 it was five
times my largest previous single win to that
point. Fortunately I called off the profit
sharing on that play, because I can handle $10
single-play myself, so it was all mine.
I asked the slot host to take a picture,
which he did with a digital camera. He had me
sign a waiver, letting the NYNY use the picture,
in exchange for which I would get a copy in the
mail, which I haven't received yet. Unknown to
me they do a lot more paperwork for jackpots of
$25,000 or over. A slot mechanic came and opened
up the machine, writing down lots of numbers.
Various suits came over as well to witness it.
It all took about 30 minutes to get paid. Results have also been good everywhere else, including the Suncoast, Orleans, and MGM Grand. Hopefully my luck will continue, but of course "luck" is just normal mathematical variation and not something ever predestined.
Ask
the Wizard!
Here's an excerpt from the newest
Ask
the Wizard, column
#173.
I am a part time
blackjack player with a lot of success in land
based casinos. I am thinking to start playing
online but I have a few questions about this.
Does a payout percentage of for example 98% mean
that you lose 2% anyway regarding good or bad
play. In European blackjack with no hole card,
if you play last box isn't it better to leave
the little card for the bank or must I hit
anyway? sometimes i have my doubts about this.
P.S. love your site THANKS -- Andrew from
Belgium
Thanks. Payout percentages such as
this are historical. See for example the
June
2006 report from King Neptune's Casino.
The 96.78% for table games means that in June
2005 the ratio of money returned to money bet
was 96.78%. In other words an actual house
edge of 3.22%. Your own results will depend
on the game rules, your skill (in games of
decision making), and luck (by which I mean
how favorable your random results are). In
most games the odds are quantifiable so
payout reports are not useful. It shouldn't
matter to you how badly other players have
played or the mix of games they chose. Where
these reports are very useful is in
evaluating the slots. No casino that I know
of volunteers how loose their slots are set,
but such payout reports gives the player a
good idea. If looking at other months you see
that King Neptune's pays about 96% in slots.
I also think it is a good sign of a good
operation to have return percentages
independently verified. It shows the casino
has nothing to hide.
What is the reason
people don't put mirrors on flat roofs in Las
Vegas. Wouldn't that cut down on the expense of
air conditioning?
I asked my father this question
since he has a Ph.D. in physics and also a
solar panel installation on his house. Here
is what he said,
It would help, but the economics might
not justify it. Probably less than 25% of
heat enters houses through the roof. The
reflectivity of the mirrors would probably
degrade to 60% or less as they age and get
dirty. It makes a lot more sense to use that
space for water heaters or solar electric
panels. On a sunny day, my roof panels
provide enough power to run both the A/C and
the pool pump, which are my biggest power
eaters. When one or both are off, my meter
runs backwards. The pool heater panels had
the pool temp up to 90 degrees last week. I
had to cut back on the pumping time.
What's
new on the site
Flashing
Dealers in Baccarat. If you're
able to see the first player card before you
place your bet, then here's my strategy for
beating baccarat.
And of course there's a new Ask the Wizard
column, #173.
Until next
time, set your expectations high.
From
Michael Bluejay....
$500
contest to redesign WizardOfOdds.com
No
one entered our contest to redesign the
website. Not even one person. Maybe the
prize wasn't high enough? Anyway, that means
that I'll be doing the redesign myself. Which is
fine by the Wizard, because he wasn't really
excited about the redesign contest in the first
place.
So we're back to our drawing for a free copy of the Wizard's book, Gambling 102. Because of privacy concerns we're no longer identifying the winners, so I'll just say that this month's winner is subscriber #543 (out of 9974).
Stupid
casino promotions
It's no secret that the online gambling industry is
sleazy. Internet casinos do
everything they can to separate you from your
money, including throwing wildly deceptive
promotions at you. I had my time wasted by one
of these come-ons recently and it made me so mad
I decided to write about it. It also underscores
why Bodog
is our only advertiser: They don't engage in the
kind of B.S. I'm about to describe.
So I get a letter in the mail from Emma
Hall at Casino Classic. They're offering me
$500 in casino chips free, with no deposit, and
say I can keep whatever I win after playing for
an hour. Naturally I expect there's a catch, but
as I scan the letter I see Emma speaks directly to my concern, saying: "No catch, no
kidding!"
Now, when someone insists, "No catch!", you
might reasonably expect that no catch is involved.
But of course, there is. And the only thing
worse than discovering a catch is discovering a
catch after explicitly being promised that there
isn't one. I can't put this any more charitably:
When Emma said, "No catch!", she was lying.
The terms and conditions are nowhere to be
found in the mailing. On their website, however, we find
these terms:
- All winnings over $200 are void.
- You must deposit $20 in order to claim
any winnings under $200.
- The playthrough is 30x before cashing
out, but 300x for video poker, and a whopping
1500x for blackjack.
So your expected loss playing blackjack is
$500 free chips x 1500 playthrough
x 0.5% house edge = $3750! If they have
video poker as generous as 99.5% (I didn't
check) then your expected loss is $750. In
short, you're not expected to win a single
dollar in this promotion. Yet here Emma is,
jumping up and down, telling me quite a
different story:
"Imagine walking into a casino,
being given $500 free, playing your favourite
games for one hour and walking away with your
winnings.... You probably wouldn't believe
it, but that is exactly what I have waiting
for you at Casino Classic! No catch, no
kidding!"
That is exactly what she has waiting
for me?! No, not even close to exactly.
And as for "No catch", this promotion is
nothing but catch.
After this experience it's not surprising
that I had to unsubscribe from their mailings
multiple times before they actually took me
off.
Visit
WizardOfOdds.com
|
©1998-2010 Wizard Of Odds Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy/Terms
Contact
Advertise
About Us
Links
|
|