Home Gambling Info Odds Gambling Online Ask the Wizard Play for Fun Blog Radio Video | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason #5 why the Wizard likes Bovada: Intelligent Bonuses Many online casinos offer huge signup bonuses, but there’s a catch. Buried in the fine print is that play on the most popular games doesn’t count towards earning the bonus. It’s common for play on blackjack, baccarat, roulette, craps, and video poker to be excluded. In many cases, only slots count. And that’s if you can even find the terms and conditions. Many casinos put their 100% bonus in big flaming letters but make you hunt all over their site to find the rules. Bovada allows play on all games to count towards the wagering requirement. It’s that simple. Just no opposite betting. All casinos ought to be as easy as Bovada about this. The bonus offer itself is simple too: on your first deposit, they’ll give you an extra 10%. If you deposit $100, you’ll wind up with $110 in chips or tokens. Finally, in the unlikely event that Bovada feels you’ve been abusing their bonuses they won’t seize your winnings like most other casinos will. In the worst case scenario they will politely tell you that they will not be offering you any future bonuses, but you are welcome to keep playing and keep everything you have made already. |
Crazy 4 PokerLast Update: Jun 24, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Super Bonus Pay Table | |
Hand | Pays |
| Four aces | 200 to 1 |
| Four 2-K | 30 to 1 |
| Straight flush | 15 to 1 |
| Three of a kind | 2 to 1 |
| Flush | 1.5 to 1 |
| Straight | 1 to 1 |
Queens Up Pay Table | ||||
Hand | Table 1 | Table 2 | Table 3 | Table 4 |
| Four of a kind | 50 to 1 | 50 to 1 | 50 to 1 | 50 to 1 |
| Straight flush | 30 to 1 | 40 to 1 | 30 to 1 | 40 to 1 |
| Three of a kind | 9 to 1 | 8 to 1 | 8 to 1 | 7 to 1 |
| Flush | 4 to 1 | 4 to 1 | 4 to 1 | 4 to 1 |
| Straight | 3 to 1 | 3 to 1 | 3 to 1 | 3 to 1 |
| Two pair | 2 to 1 | 2 to 1 | 2 to 1 | 2 to 1 |
| Pair of queens or better | 1 to 1 | 1 to 1 | 1 to 1 | 1 to 1 |
Stanley Ko's "simplified strategy" is as follows.
The cost of using the simplified strategy compared to optimal strategy is only 0.0002% of the total wager.
The next table shows the probability of each hand and the return under pay table 3 of the Queens Up side bet. I chose table 3 because that is the one I noticed at a casino here in Las Vegas. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 5.32%.
Return for Queens Up Pay Table 3 | ||||
Hand | Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Four of a kind | 624 | 0.00024 | 50 | 0.012005 |
| Straight flush | 2072 | 0.000797 | 30 | 0.023917 |
| Three of a kind | 58656 | 0.022569 | 8 | 0.180552 |
| Flush | 114616 | 0.044101 | 4 | 0.176403 |
| Straight | 101808 | 0.039173 | 3 | 0.117518 |
| Two pair | 123552 | 0.047539 | 2 | 0.095078 |
| Pair of queens or better | 242916 | 0.093467 | 1 | 0.093467 |
| Nothing | 1954716 | 0.752115 | -1 | -0.752115 |
| Total | 2598960 | 1 | -0.053175 | |
The next table shows the house edge according to all four Queens Up pay tables.
Queens Up House Edge | |
Pay Table | House Edge |
| 1 | 3.06% |
| 2 | 4.52% |
| 3 | 5.32% |
| 4 | 6.78% |
The next table shows the return of the Ante bet under optimal player strategy.
Return for Ante bet | ||||
| Event | Probability | Pays | Return | |
| Player folds | 0.235073 | -1 | -0.235073 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and wins | 0.215511 | 2 | 0.431022 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and ties | 0.000206 | 0 | 0 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and loses | 0.274169 | -2 | -0.548338 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and dealer doesn't qualify | 0.08942 | 1 | 0.08942 | |
| Player raises 3 units and wins | 0.139517 | 4 | 0.558067 | |
| Player raises 3 units and ties | 0.000073 | 0 | 0 | |
| Player raises 3 units and loses | 0.017084 | -4 | -0.068335 | |
| Player raises 3 units and dealer doesn't qualify | 0.028948 | 3 | 0.086844 | |
| Total | 1 | 0.313607 | ||
The next table shows the return of the Super Bonus bet under optimal player strategy.
Return for Super Bonus bet | ||||
| Event | Probability | Pays | Return | |
| Four aces | 0.000018 | 200 | 0.003694 | |
| Four 2-K | 0.000222 | 30 | 0.006649 | |
| Straight flush | 0.000797 | 15 | 0.011959 | |
| Three of a kind | 0.022569 | 2 | 0.045138 | |
| Flush | 0.044101 | 1.5 | 0.066151 | |
| Straight | 0.039173 | 1 | 0.039173 | |
| Player loses with less than straight or folds | 0.520558 | -1 | -0.520558 | |
| Other | 0.372562 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 1 | -0.347795 | ||
So, the player has an expected return of 0.313607 on the Ante bet and -0.347795 on the Super Bonus. The net player expected return on these two bets is 0.313607-0.347795 = -0.034189. If we were to define the house edge as the expected player loss to either one of the Ante or Super Bonus bets then the answer would be 3.42%. For example if the player bet $1 on the Ante and $1 on the Super Bonus then he could expect to lose 3.42 cents overall. If we were to define the house edge as the expected loss of the sum of both wagers then we would divide by 3.42% by 2 to get 1.71%. The overall average wager is 3.136171 units, thus the element of risk (expected loss divided by total wager) is 1.09%.
Note: There is also a similar game called Four Card Poker.
Shufflemaster's official web site for Crazy 4 Poker.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Wizard of Odds Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. • About | Privacy & Terms | Site Map | Links | Contact
The Wizard’s other sites: Wizard of Vegas | Wizard of Macau | Math Problems • Recommended: Vegas Click