Get the Wizard's free newsletter!

Monthly, 100% spam-free

Ask the Wizard: Bonuses & Promotions at Online Casinos

Questions about Online Gambling

FAQ

General Questions

Game Fairness & Disputes

Shuffling & Dealing

Bonus Offers

Specific Casinos,
Software, & Games

Where to find
specific games

What do you consider bonus abuse? Almost every online casino has conditions that are vague when it comes to bonus abuse, which makes me leery. As an example, recently I took an offer of 100% match on a $300 deposit with a 20X rollover and 60 day requirement. I went bust trying for a big hit, so they made another similar offer with the same results and have now made a third offer. My concern is that should I make a big hit now, they could argue that since I didn't make a "normal" deposit, I would be considered a bonus abuser. Should I be concerned? -- Kevin from Van Nuys, CA

Good question. The industry has added so many rules to bonuses that often it is like navigating a minefield to stay in compliance. Break just one rule and not only can they take back the bonus but winnings as well. It is acceptable for a casino to seize a bonus if the terms aren't met but it is not fair for them to seize winnings as well. Even if the player doesn't break any rules most casinos may still seize a player's winnings for any reason it wishes under the "management discretion" clause found buried in most terms and conditions. As an example look at one of the most respected casinos in the industry, King Neptune’s, as discussed at Casino Meister. They seized £8000 from a player for playing the wrong game, which was added to a list of excluded games the day before the player played.

I regret that it has come to this but terms and conditions in the industry have become so complicated and change so frequently that as a general rule I advise recreational gamblers to not accept bonuses. Only bonus hunters experienced at parsing the fine print should take the risk. Ironically, these are the same gamblers the casinos are trying to protect themselves from, and are the only ones they are going to be left with if the true gamblers get scared off by the minefield.

So, yes, you should be concerned. However that is also a good bonus. I would read the rules very carefully. Then be aggressive and go for a big win early or go bust trying.

Update (May 31, 2006): Within hours of the publication of this column I received a response from Micki representing Trident Entertainment Group, of which King Neptunes Casino is a part. I originally incorrectly stated that the player played the bonus the same day as the rules were changed. In fact the player played the following day, based on server time. So I apologize for that misunderstanding. The letter also details other points arguing the casino's point of view. In the interests of expressing both versions I present the following message from Micki.

Hello Michael

I would just like to correct your statement regarding the issue with the player at King Neptune’s. I know you are ethical and accurate and therefore find it strange that your information is incorrect.

Our Terms & Conditions state very clearly the month they are valid for. This is a sign-up bonus, so who would we inform that we are changing any clauses. The Terms and Conditions also state that they apply from the date the bonus is claimed. This player claims to have read the T & C’s when they stated March 1-31. She did not however register or deposit to play until April 1 9:36pm Server time. They April 1-31 T & C’s were actually loaded soon after 10:00pm on March 31, over 21 hours before she registered, deposited and claimed her bonus. It should also be noted that this player used her bonus money to play on the excluded game. No clause in our T & C’s is buried, everything is in the same font with the Excluded Game list highlighted for the benefit of the player. Had she not used Bonus money to play on the excluded game she would have been paid. Never the less we still left her account with 400 in it, so she could start again. The funds are still there and still available to her.

I thought you should be aware of the facts.

Regards

Micki

May 31, 2006
I have a friend that put $100 into a casino web site. He got a $300 bonus for a total of $400. He had to wager $8,000 to clear the bonus. I have done the math and I know that the casino advantage is not in excess of the bonus and that the player has an advantage up until he clears. He kept going for a week. He is up to over $5,500 in winnings. I have never heard of this. What are the chances? I don't get it. It seems almost impossible, like winning the lottery. What do you think? - Jeffrey L. from Auburn, Maine
If you're not afraid of losing, a good way to get out of the wagering requirement is to bet aggressively early, either going for a big win or go bust trying. If you make the big win then grind out required play more conservatively. However, that isn't what you were asking. The probability of turning $400 into $5,900 ($5,500 in winnings), assuming no house edge, is 400/5,900 = 6.78%. Of course there usually is a house edge but if you're smart you can keep it very low. So 6.78% would be an upper bound on the probability. May 10, 2006

If an online casino offered this deal would it still be profitable? Over a one-month period, you take the entire profit/loss of each player. If the player is in profit you, you give them an extra 10% of their profit and deposit it to their accounts at the end of the month. If the player has lost money, you give them 25% of their loss back and credit this back to their account at the end of the month. Would the online casino still be profitable? What is the risk? Can anyone do the math behind this? - Max from London

If the players were smart they would have a huge advantage! Assume the player made just one bet on an even-money bet in single-zero roulette. The players expected profit would be pr(win)*(1.1) - pr(lose)*0.8 = (18/37)*1.1 - (19/37)*0.8 = 12.43%. In an online environment a high percentage of players grind through their entire deposit until they lose everything, the casino might be okay. However I think the pros would smell blood and attack it and the casino would get killed. Aug. 21, 2005

What is the 'statistical' dollar value of a phantom bonus? Say I deposit $100 and get another $100 in phantom bonus. If my goal is to win $100 (total balance of $300), how much approximate value is the phantom bonus worth to me?

Ignoring the house edge, the probability of reaching your goal is 2/3 and the expected value of the phantom bonus is $33.33. For a phantom bonus of b, cashable chips of c, and a winning goal of g the probability of reaching your goal is (c+b)/g and the expected value of the phantom bonus is ((c+b)/g)*(g-b)-c. In general, the higher the winning goal the greater the expected value of the phantom bonus. Feb. 21, 2005

Didn't Kiss Casino used to use Boss Media? If so what are the odds that I could get their welcome bonus again with their current software?

Yes, Kiss used to be a Boss casino. I'd say your odds are quite good of getting the welcome bonus again. I've pretended to be a new player when a casino changed software a few times and it has always worked for me. Nov. 8, 2004

I have encountered an unusual kind of bonus at Aqua Online casinos. If you deposit $100 they will lend you $200. However if you have any money left when you cash out they will deduct the $200 your borrowed. What is your advice on how to maximize the value of this bonus?

My advice is to try to achieve a very large win or go bust trying. The greater your winning goal is, up to a point, the greater your expected return. Personally I would try to get to about $2000. It is paradoxical but the only way to realize the value of the bonus is to lose everything. So you want a high probability of ruin. Hopefully that won't happen and you will have a very nice windfall. Dec. 2, 2003

I read your review of casinos and want to try Club Dice. Regarding the terms on their website, they mention the bonus will be deducted from the account once you make the cash-in even you fulfill the wager requirement. I wonder then what is the meaning of this bonus?

This is what is called a "sticky bonus" and is not confined to Internet casinos. When I went to Germany I had to pay 20 Duetchmarks to get in. However if purchased 100 Duetchmarks in chips they gave me a free 20 in sticky chips. A sticky bonus or sticky chip is one that can never be cashed out. However if you bet it and win the winnings are real money. They way to get rid of sticky chips is to keep betting them until you lose them. In the case of Internet casinos you will need to keep cashing out winnings and always leave the sticky bonus in your account, then go back and play again.

Recently at the Miami Beach casino I did a 100% promotion for a $1000 deposit. Eventually I lost $1650 and tried to cash out my last $350. They declined it, stating in effect that the $1000 bonus was sticky. So I played more and kept cashing out when my balance was significantly above $1000. In the end I cashed out 7 or 8 times for a total of $4700.

In the long run sticky bonuses just force the player to bet more. The expected value of a sticky bonus is close to 100% less 2 times the house edge in even money based games. Nov. 19, 2003

Most online casinos offer bonus offers but do not allow wagers on games like roulette, craps and baccarat to be part of the necessary wagering requirements. I am wondering about the exact reason for this. They usually state that no risk wagering is not allowed and a player's account would be audited before any payout so it wouldn't make sense to do this anyway. Are they trying to stop players playing games which offer close to even money options then? It seems to me unfair to stop new players to a casino playing such popular games such as these after offering a bonus.

Also you answered a previous question about player abuse by saying you should play 100% more than the minimum requirement to cash out the bonus. As I see it if the casino lays down the rules for minimum wagering then that is all that is required by the player and if he can wager 8x the bonus without losing it then he deserves to be able to cash it out without being labeled a player abuser! Thanks for your time wizard. - Chris Hall from Palmerston north, New Zealand

The reason they do this is that before they implemented this rule some players would bet equal amounts on red and black in roulette, or the pass and don't pass in craps. This would allow them to earn a bonus without putting much money at risk. So the online casinos added this rule in an effort to keep these bonus players out. Casino on Net does allow play on any game but reserves the right to refuse the bonus if the player bets on opposites, which I think is a more reasonable solution.

You are absolutely right that a casino should honor a bonus even if the player bets exactly the player requirement and not $1 more. Unfortunately many Internet casinos owners don't think they have to abide by their own rules and make them and break them as they go. Two years ago the Golden Palace rounded up all the players they considered to be not be giving enough free play and locked them out of their accounts. I know this because I had one of the accounts. After a lengthy audit they reopened some accounts but seized the funds of others and donated them to charity. This was despite the fact that the players followed every rule. It just goes to show that there is no credible regulation of Internet gambling and that appearances are very important. That is why I advise players to not even look like they are only after a bonus and to provide plenty of extra play. May 8, 2002

I just received the e-mail bonus offer for Casino Grand Bay and downloaded their software. I was not able to locate their bonus requirement information but according to bet2gamble.com they require a player to bet 1x deposit to receive the bonus and then the player must bet 7x bonus before withdrawing the bonus. Assuming this is correct it sounds like a decent offer. However, it was also stated that Blackjack play does not qualify for the bonus requirement. Therefore, what game, if any, should be played to limit the risk of losing the bonus/deposit? - Joe from Ramona, USA

If only blackjack were excluded I would say craps. However many Internet casinos exclude craps to prevent players from betting on the pass and don't pass at the same time, thus earning the bonus without risking much. Next I would consider video poker. Casino Grand Bay is a Microgaming casino which offers Jacks or Better video poker. Following the optimal strategy the return is 99.54%. If you use my intermediate strategy, which has a return of 99.54%. So I would go with that. Had this been another casino with stingy video poker I would have played baccarat, always betting on the banker. April 22, 2002

Thank you for all the excellent information that you provide. My question concerns your recent answer to the question about gambling for a living. Specifically, making a living from internet casino bonuses. Do you think that this is still possible? Back in 2000, I made a good deal of money from Internet bonuses. If I had worked on it full time, I probably could have quit my job. However in 2001, I only made about 4 grand all year from Internet bonuses. The reason for that is the fact that casinos have gotten so stingy with their bonuses. Many of them require a player to play a deposit five or more times before withdrawing. This of course cuts down a player's advantage and also makes a streak of bad luck a decent possibility. Even with a 100k bankroll, it does not seem that this could work. Am I wrong? Is there something else I don't know about? - Tim from Chicago, USA

The days when it was easy to make good money gambling on the Internet are over. Players can still make $50 here and $100 all over the place but the $500 or more bonuses are hard to come by any more. It isn't the play requirements that are ruining bonus hunting, it is caps on the size of bonuses. To give an example, consider a 20% bonus with a 5 times play requirement, up to a $100 bonus. If you deposit $500 then the expected loss of $2500 in action playing basic strategy blackjack is only $10, assuming an 0.4% house edge. Even if you play ten times through the deposit the expected loss is still only $20, which is much less than the $100 bonus. The problem, in my opinion, is that it isn't worth the fuss for only $80. Feb. 11, 2002

I have seen several references to ongoing bonus abuses from people who reside in Denmark. Do you know more details about what is going on here? What are they doing, and how can we avoid being bonus abusers? - Rich

I don't know all the details but apparently there is something rotten in the state of Denmark, or at least there is a lot of bonus abuse going on by players from there. The way to avoid being labeled a bonus abuser is to always play much more than required. I hate to give an exact figure but exceeding requirements by at least 100% is a good idea. Giving free play to casinos you get repeated bonuses from is also good camouflage. It doesn't look like you are a good faith gambler if you only play during promotions. In general don't be too greedy. Oct. 30, 2001

How do online casino's work out their promotions? What is the best sort of promotion to play, money bonus on sign-up or cash back on games? I ask because I have just received a promotion offering 5 per cent of total stake back on any one of five games (keno, slots, sic-bo, video poker and roulette) and wonder if it's worth playing. -- Steve Goss of Lyon France.

Hey, I know a Steve Goss. He is currently a deputy chief actuary with Social Security and soon to be the chief actuary. I know because I used be an actuary at the Social Security headquarters in Baltimore, Maryland. You can read some of my papers I wrote there here. Forgive me for getting off topic. There is no simple answer to which is better, a deposit bonus or cash back based on total money bet. You have to consider the percentages offered, the amount of play required, and the house edge of the games in question. This 5% cash back promotion sounds great for any game with a house edge of less than five percent. The house edge on the small and big bets in sic bo have a house edge of only 2.78%. Video poker may be even lower depending on the pay table. I would be interested to know who is offering this. Nov. 4, 2000

5A promotion from an on-line casino lets the customer select various options. The options range from a 10% bonus requiring wagering 2X the deposit, up to a 100% bonus requiring wagering 10X the deposit. How would you determine which option to take assuming you are willing to take a 5% chance of going broke & assume a 0.5% house edge in their 2-deck blackjack game? Harvey Green, Kansas City, Missouri

I would wager 10X for the 100% bonus. If you make the bet size small enough you can still stay under a 5% chance of going broke. I don't have the exact number but if each bet were 1% of the total deposit I doubt the probability of going broke would be more than 5%, even betting 10 times the bankroll. Oct. 15, 2000

Q: Thanks for answering my questions. I want to deposit as much as I can at good casinos to take advantage of the "new player" bonus but how much do you think is too much? I don't like wasting an opportunity to get a large 20% bonus by getting a small 20% bonus, but how much is too much? What's been your experience? - Scott T.

A: Don't worry about depositing too much money. I almost always deposit the maximum when playing for a bonus. What is much more likely to arouse suspicion is not playing enough. Aug. 13, 2000

Questions about Online Gambling

FAQ

General Questions

Game Fairness & Disputes

Shuffling & Dealing

Bonus Offers

Specific Casinos,
Software, & Games

Where to find
specific games

The Wizard has answered questions about...

Specific Games

General Topics

Baccarat
Bingo
Blackjack
Caribbean Stud Poker
Craps
Horse Racing
Keno

Let It Ride
Lottery
Pai Gow Poker
Poker
Roulette
Slot Machines

Spanish 21
Sports Betting
Texas Hold 'Em
Three Card Poker
Video Poker

Other Casino Games
Non-Casino Games
TV Game Shows

Betting Systems
Boyfriends
Casinos
Dealers
General
Online Gaming
Probability
Table Games in general
The Wizard himself

A bulletin board is in the works, coming late 2009....

©1998-2010 Wizard Of Odds Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.   Privacy/Terms   Contact   Advertise   About Us   Links

The Wizard's other sites: Wizard of Vegas, Wizard of Macau, Math Problems The Wizard recommends: The Bear Growls,   Casinomeister, Online Casino Suite