|
|
|
Reason #2 why the Wizard likes Bodog:
No-hassle practice games
Most online casinos spend more effort trying to separate you from your money than they do trying to give you a good experience. They have all kinds of popup windows, they usually make you download their software, and if do they offer play-in-browser games then you have to register an account before you can play. And if you do register then they start sending you emails trying to get you to deposit real money.
But Bodog is different. They have no popup windows at all, and their practice games play right in your browser, with no download, and no registration required. You don't even have to give up your email address. It couldn't be simpler: Just one click and you're playing the game.
I wish all online casinos showed this much respect for their players. Other casinos practically ask for your first born child to play for free. Meanwhile Bodog is patient and does not twist anybody's arm to play for real money. You can play as long as you like for free with no obligation. The real-money games are available if that's your preference, but if not, you can play the free practice games for as long as you like without hassle. (Visit Bodog)
Try blackjack at Bodog.
One click and you're in:
 No popups, no download, no registration, no B.S., just the game.
|
|
|
|
Ask the Wizard! (No. 101)
April 11, 2004 column
Its not exactly gambling but I always wondered on the Price is Right gameshow what the best strategy to take when spinning the big wheel when you are not last to spin. Assuming you can't control your spin (completely random outcome), 5 cent increments from $.05 to $1.00, you get one spin or two spins added together, you can't go over 1.00. At what amount should you not take your second spin so that you can have the best chance to beat the player who spins after you? - Tony C.
The first player should spin again if his first spin is 65 cents or less.
If any of the following conditions are true the second player should spin again.
- His score is less than the first player's score.
- His score is 50 cents or less.
- His score is 65 cents or less and he has tied the first player.
The third player should spin again if his score is less than the current highest
score. If his first spin ties the highest score he should spin again if the
tie is at 45 cents or less. If the tie is at 50 cents he has an equal chance of
winning by spinning again or not. If the there is a three way tie after the first spin
of the third player he should spin again if the tie is at 65 cents or less.
The Fremont in downtown Vegas offers a video poker game called Treasure Chest. It's basically Jacks or Better with the full pay table with one change - if you bet max coins and get four of a kind, you are taken to a bonus screen where you can choose one of five treasure chests. The chests contain 120, 160, 320, 640, or 1,000 coins. How does this affect the theoretical return and does it change the optimum strategy? From playing, I can say most of the time you get 120 coins, and sometimes 160. Higher values seem rarer. I suspect the chest value depends on how fast you select the chest after getting to that screen.
I've seen this game. As I understand gaming regulations it is permissible to have the lower prizes more likely than the higher prizes. The best you can do is to estimate the average win of a four of a kind and then run that through a program like this one to get at the optimal return. To get a strategy you can use Video Poker Strategy Master or Frugal Video Poker by entering any pay table.
Hi Mike, Just to lighten the mood a little, I remember watching you play roulette
on a special Vegas Challenge show a while ago. Obviously you knew your
expected value wouldn't change regardless of strategy. I remember you playing only
one number, but I forgot if you changed after a win. Not sure what I'd
do in your situation, but out of curiosity, did you play the single
number as opposed to an outside bet like red/black to maximize the
variance? That way if you get "lucky" you'll be ahead by the most?
Anyway, I enjoyed the fact that you played a really conservative and
boring strategy.
You accessed my strategy quite well. I intended to bet the minimum through most of the hour to avoid the house edge grinding me down. The producer was not happy with such a boring strategy so I tried to act more excited than I normally would be. The reason I picked a single number as opposed to an even money bet is that I wanted volatility. I knew if I ended close to my starting point of $10,000 I would probably lose. So I wanted a bigger shot at getting ahead. I stuck with 23 the entire time, although towards the end I added 5 as well. I'm Glad you liked the show.
I have heard it is illegal for a slot machine to deliberately have too many near misses. Can you tell me what you know about this?
To answer your question I asked a well connected gaming consultant and he said Nevada regulations state that one stop on a reel can not be weighted more than six times more than either stop next to it. So if a jackpot symbol were weighted by 1 and both bordering blanks were weighted by 6 then there would be 12 near misses for every one time the reel stopped on the jackpot symbol. This would be the maximum allowed near miss effect. My own results detailed in my slot machine appendix 1 back up this theory well. The red double seven was the highest paying symbol and I saw the blanks above and below it about 5 to 6 times as often:
| Double Strike Actual Results |
| Symbol |
Reel 1 |
Reel 2 |
Reel 3 |
| Blank | 250 | 248 | 291 |
| Double red 7 | 52 | 51 | 55 |
| Blank | 259 | 292 | 262 |
The same source said that New Jersey and Mississippi likely have adopted the Nevada regulations.
I looked up and down on your blackjack section and can't find out "how" to surrender. I know what it is and all, but do I just grab half my chips and that's that?
No, you never touch your chips once the bet has been made until the hand is over. The signal to surrender is to use your index finger and pretend to draw a line along the blackjack table, just behind your bet from left to right. I didn't even know this until a friend from Europe did just that recently at the table. It is just as good to simply say "surrender."
I think I read somewhere that if someone could come up with a system that had even only 1% player edge, you could easily turn 1000$ into 1000000$. But some video pokers have an 0.77% player edge, why aren't you turning it into like $770,000 or something? Is it because you can't bet more than 5$ at a time and it would take WAY too much time? Thx. And oh, I said it before, and I'll say it again, LOVE your site!!
Thanks! Yes, I said before that if I had a betting system that had just a 1% advantage I could turn $1000 into $1,000,000 by simply grinding out that edge. This would also be possible in video poker but it would take much longer because the 0.77% advantage game (full pay deuces wild) can only be found in the quarter level. Assuming you can play 1000 hands per hour (a speed few can attain) and played perfectly that would result in an average income of $9.63 per hour. To reach $1,000,000 would require working 11.86 years non-stop. $1000 would also be very undercapitalized to play quarter video poker, so the risk of ruin would be quite high. It would be faster to reach the $1,000,000 with the same edge in a table game because the player can bet more.
©1998-2010 Wizard Of Odds Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy/Terms
Contact
Advertise
About Us
Links
|
|
