Home Gambling Info Odds Gambling Online Ask the Wizard Play for Fun Blog Radio Video | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason #2 why the Wizard likes Bovada: No-hassle practice games Most online casinos spend more effort trying to separate you from your money than they do trying to give you a good experience. They have all kinds of popup windows, they usually make you download their software, and if they do offer play-in-browser games then you have to register an account before you can play. And if you register they start sending you emails trying to get you to deposit real money. But Bovada is different. They have no popup windows at all, and their practice games play right in your browser, with no download, and no registration required. You don’t even have to give up your email address. It couldn’t be simpler: just one click and you’re playing the game. I wish all online casinos showed this much respect for their players. Other casinos practically ask for your first born child to play for free. Meanwhile Bovada is patient and does not twist anybody’s arm to play for real money. You can play as long as you like for free with no obligation. The real-money games are available if that’s your preference, but if not, you can play the free practice games for as long as you like without hassle. |
Crazy 4 PokerLast Update: June 24, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Super Bonus Pay Table |
|
|
Hand |
Pays |
| Four aces | 200 to 1 |
| Four 2-K | 30 to 1 |
| Straight flush | 15 to 1 |
| Three of a kind | 2 to 1 |
| Flush | 1.5 to 1 |
| Straight | 1 to 1 |
|
Queens Up Pay Table |
||||
|
Hand |
Table 1 | Table 2 | Table 3 | Table 4 |
| Four of a kind | 50 to 1 | 50 to 1 | 50 to 1 | 50 to 1 |
| Straight flush | 30 to 1 | 40 to 1 | 30 to 1 | 40 to 1 |
| Three of a kind | 9 to 1 | 8 to 1 | 8 to 1 | 7 to 1 |
| Flush | 4 to 1 | 4 to 1 | 4 to 1 | 4 to 1 |
| Straight | 3 to 1 | 3 to 1 | 3 to 1 | 3 to 1 |
| Two pair | 2 to 1 | 2 to 1 | 2 to 1 | 2 to 1 |
| Pair of queens or better | 1 to 1 | 1 to 1 | 1 to 1 | 1 to 1 |
Stanley Ko's "simplified strategy" is as follows.
The cost of using the simplified strategy compared to optimal strategy is only 0.0002% of the total wager.
The next table shows the probability of each hand and the return under pay table 3 of the Queens Up side bet. I chose table 3 because that is the one I noticed at a casino here in Las Vegas. The lower right cell shows a house edge of 5.32%.
|
Return for Queens Up Pay Table 3 |
||||
|
Hand |
Combinations | Probability | Pays | Return |
| Four of a kind | 624 | 0.00024 | 50 | 0.012005 |
| Straight flush | 2072 | 0.000797 | 30 | 0.023917 |
| Three of a kind | 58656 | 0.022569 | 8 | 0.180552 |
| Flush | 114616 | 0.044101 | 4 | 0.176403 |
| Straight | 101808 | 0.039173 | 3 | 0.117518 |
| Two pair | 123552 | 0.047539 | 2 | 0.095078 |
| Pair of queens or better | 242916 | 0.093467 | 1 | 0.093467 |
| Nothing | 1954716 | 0.752115 | -1 | -0.752115 |
| Total | 2598960 | 1 | -0.053175 | |
The next table shows the house edge according to all four Queens Up pay tables.
|
Queens Up House Edge |
|
|
Pay Table |
House Edge |
| 1 | 3.06% |
| 2 | 4.52% |
| 3 | 5.32% |
| 4 | 6.78% |
The next table shows the return of the Ante bet under optimal player strategy.
|
Return for Ante bet |
||||
| Event | Probability | Pays | Return | |
| Player folds | 0.235073 | -1 | -0.235073 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and wins | 0.215511 | 2 | 0.431022 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and ties | 0.000206 | 0 | 0 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and loses | 0.274169 | -2 | -0.548338 | |
| Player raises 1 unit and dealer doesn't qualify | 0.08942 | 1 | 0.08942 | |
| Player raises 3 units and wins | 0.139517 | 4 | 0.558067 | |
| Player raises 3 units and ties | 0.000073 | 0 | 0 | |
| Player raises 3 units and loses | 0.017084 | -4 | -0.068335 | |
| Player raises 3 units and dealer doesn't qualify | 0.028948 | 3 | 0.086844 | |
| Total | 1 | 0.313607 | ||
The next table shows the return of the Super Bonus bet under optimal player strategy.
|
Return for Super Bonus bet |
||||
| Event | Probability | Pays | Return | |
| Four aces | 0.000018 | 200 | 0.003694 | |
| Four 2-K | 0.000222 | 30 | 0.006649 | |
| Straight flush | 0.000797 | 15 | 0.011959 | |
| Three of a kind | 0.022569 | 2 | 0.045138 | |
| Flush | 0.044101 | 1.5 | 0.066151 | |
| Straight | 0.039173 | 1 | 0.039173 | |
| Player loses with less than straight or folds | 0.520558 | -1 | -0.520558 | |
| Other | 0.372562 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 1 | -0.347795 | ||
So, the player has an expected return of 0.313607 on the Ante bet and -0.347795 on the Super Bonus. The net player expected return on these two bets is 0.313607-0.347795 = -0.034189. If we were to define the house edge as the expected player loss to either one of the Ante or Super Bonus bets then the answer would be 3.42%. For example if the player bet $1 on the Ante and $1 on the Super Bonus then he could expect to lose 3.42 cents overall. If we were to define the house edge as the expected loss of the sum of both wagers then we would divide by 3.42% by 2 to get 1.71%. The overall average wager is 3.136171 units, thus the element of risk (expected loss divided by total wager) is 1.09%.
Note: There is also a similar game called Four Card Poker.
Shufflemaster's official web site for Crazy 4 Poker
.