Ask the Wizard: |
Questions about Pai Gow Poker |
In Pai Gow Poker, the high hand must be greater than the low. I didn't notice a similar rule for tiles, though your Java game enforces one. Are players (not banking) allowed to set hands foul, and then forfeit, as in pai gow poker? Do you know what happens in tile tournaments? Can a player request "house way" in a tournament? — Tabby Cat from Huntington Beach
In pai gow tiles, it is always obvious which hand is higher. You don't need to know where to place the high hand. Just make any two stacks of two tiles each, and the dealer will figure it out. I have never once heard of a pai gow tiles tournament. However, the Las Vegas Hilton has an annual pai gow poker tournament. I'm not certain whether you can request the house way, but I would bet against it. It is a very strict rule in most tournaments that the dealer can not give advice of any kind. June 7, 2008
What is the standard deviation for pai gow tiles? — Doyle from Reno
I'm learning pai gow (tiles) for my next trip to Vegas. I would like to take advantage of the "banking" rules, but I have a couple of concerns, specifically banking and comps. If another player at the table shoves in a huge bet after I decide to bank, can I change my mind? Also, what happens if I don't have enough chips to cover all the bets at the table?
Second, I hear that pai gow players are rated much lower than other table games per bet due to the slower pace of the game, true? Do you have an educated guess what the average bet in pai gow would have to be to equal the comp privileges of a $25/bet Blackjack player? — Uncle Mo from Parker
Your timing is good with this question. The summer of 2007 shall be referred to as my "summer of pai gow," because I am devoting a great deal of analysis to the game. About banking, yes, you can change your mind about banking, if a player makes a bet larger than you are comfortable with. It is a rule that you must have enough chips in front of you to cover all the action. My May 5, 2007 column shows that pai gow is rated at 30 hands per hour, at least by the casino that gave me the figures. If you multiply the assumed house edge and hands per hour in that table, you can see the blackjack is rated at 0.525 bet units per hour, and pai gow at 0.495, so blackjack is only slightly better at the same bet size. Although the expected loss is greater in pai gow, the standard deviation is much less. This makes pai gow a great game if you are playing for a rating, and wish to minimize risk. June 19, 2007
For pai gow poker at Mohegan Sun Casino in CT, the casino allows you to bet your commission (i.e. bet $21 to win $20). I see it as a small advantage because you are not paying commission on the extra 5% you are betting. Is it truly advantageous to do so? How does it change the house odds? - Jay R. from Shelton, CT
From my pai gow poker section, the probability of the banker winning is 29.91%. So instead of paying the usual 5% commission as player you are paying 4.76%. That will lower the house edge by 0.2991*(0.05-0.0476) = 0.07%. April 12, 2007
Great Site! Could pai gow poker be a positive expectation game if the other players bet enough while you are banking? – Michael from Knoxville, TN
Yes! The following table shows the house edge as both player and banker according to the number of other players. The last column shows the ratio of overall action as banker to player to break even. So with seven players, or six opponents, you would need to bet 13 times more as banker than player.
| Required Banker Ratio to Break Even in Pai Gow Poker |
| Players |
House Edge Banker |
House Edge Player |
Breakeven Ratio |
| 2 | 0.2% | 2.73% | N/A |
| 3 | -0.02% | 2.73% | 136.5 |
| 4 | -0.1% | 2.73% | 27.3 |
| 5 | -0.15% | 2.73% | 18.2 |
| 6 | -0.19% | 2.73% | 14.4 |
| 7 | -0.21% | 2.73% | 13 |
April 12, 2007
Thanks for teaching me Pai Gow Tiles. I had a most profitable time on my last Vegas trip. The question is that at many casinos the limit is $25. When winning, the house vig at some casinos is $1 on $25 bet equaling 4% not the 5% usually as they don't have quarters. Does this affect the house’s edge if you do not vary the amount bet or stick to odd amounts bet? – John from Raleigh, NC
You’re welcome. That was a difficult game to explain. The following table shows the house edge both ways, and the difference, assuming both player and dealer use the same house way.
| House Edge in Pai Gow |
| Event |
5% Comm. |
4% Comm. |
Difference |
| Player | 0.023896 | 0.020811 | -0.003085 |
| Banker | 0.007377 | 0.004207 | -0.00317 |
February 7, 2007
I was playing pai-gow poker last week at a Las Vegas casino. The other player at the table got tired of losing to the dealer and decided to bank the next hand. Once that hand's cards were dealt he immediately picked up his hand and started to set it. I told him that since I could potentially look at his cards it wasn't a good idea to do that before I set my hand. I also added that he probably wasn't even allowed to set his hand early. The dealer said that it was in fact allowed since it could only put him at a disadvantage. I didn't look at his hand, but if I had I could have split my pair to strengthen the low hand and salvage a push. So I have two questions.
Is a banker required to wait to set his hand until after the other hands are set?
If he does not do so, is it poor etiquette to use the information to the player's advantage? I would think that it is since doing so is essentially spying on the banker's hand. – Brian from Crystal, MN
Here in Vegas they always seem to tuck the cards under your bet when you bank and don’t allow you to touch them until everybody else has finished setting their hands. If you try to look at them early the dealer will give you a sharp rebuke. However in your casino I wouldn’t hesitate to try to take a peek if the banking player is setting his hand early. Just try to be discreet. I would liken it to a dealer in blackjack flashing his hole card. That is great information to have and it is perfectly legal to use it.
November 23, 2006
There's this Pai Gow Poker sidebet in Casino Niagara which pays out of a jackpot rather than at fixed odds. I'm wondering what amount the jackpot has to be at for that bet to break even (assuming one set the hand to maximize return of jackpot bet). – William from Mississauga, Ontario
Love the site!! As mentioned in response to another question, some casinos offer a Dragon Hand in pai gow poker. My theory is to play it if I have, trips or better, preferably without the joker. Others play when they have nothing. Is there any logic to either methodology? -- Michael from Las Vegas
I never play the dragon hand myself because it always loses on copies. Regardless of what is in your hand you have the same odds of making any given hand as the dealer, assuming the same strategy. So if you must play it you may do so whenever you like.
May 18, 2006
First off, thanks for maintaining this site! I find it helpful, and also being a fellow actuary, I can appreciate the amount of detail that you put forth here, and how you can explain the math behind these games in layman (i.e. - non-actuarial) terms. Anyway, I have an etiquette question regarding Pai Gow Poker. I often play this game while in Vegas with friends, and several of them will pull back their bet and sit out a hand when a fellow player decides to be banker. I personally don't do this, being of the mindset that, (a) if I lose, I'd rather my money go to another player instead of the house, or (b) if I win, if the banking player wagering the money, and they're willing to lose it, so it's not difference to them if I get the winning or the house does. I'm curious as to what your opinion is on this practice. Thanks again for maintaining this site! Keep up the great work! -- Andy from Chicago, IL
Thanks for the kind words. I always like to hear from real actuaries out there. My opinion is that it is very bad etiquette to pull back a bet when another player is banking unless the player banking doesn’t mind. Sometimes there is collusion between players to not bank against each other, to reduce losses and volatility. Absent that, refusing to play against a player banker denies the banker the favorable odds the dealer usually enjoys. That just isn’t cool to happily give your money to the casino but not a fellow player. It would be like refusing to give somebody your luggage cart at the airport when you were done with it, even if offered the 25-cent refund.
May 2, 2006
Back in 2002 you answered a question about Washington State and commission free pai-gow, or fortune pai-gow as it's called, saying that since the house always banks, the house advantage is 1.44%. Well, they do allow player banking with commission free pai-gow, so how does that now effect the house advantage? - Michael from Marysville
According to my sources in Washington state many casinos waive the 5% commission if the player makes the Fortune side bet. The most common pay table for the Fortune bet in Washington I'm told is 2/3/4/5/25/50/150/400/1000/2000/8000, which has a house edge of 5.85% less 0.93% for each additional player at the table. So the expected loss of a $5 Fortune bet is 29.25 cents less 4.75 cents for each additional player. The following table shows the breakeven point between making and not make the Fortune bet according to the number of other players at the table.
1 player: $22.67
2 players: $19.07
3 players: $15.47
4 players: $11.86
5 players: $8.26
6 players: $4.65
For example if there are three other players you should make the Fortune bet if your pai gow poker bet is $16 or more, and not if it is $15 or less.
The next table shows the overall expected return according to the number of other players and the bet amount, when not banking.
| Expected Return as Player in Washington State Pai Gow Poker |
Other Players |
$5 bet |
$10 bet |
$25 bet |
$50 bet |
$100 bet |
$200 bet |
$500 bet |
| 1 | -2.73% | -2.73% | -2.18% | -1.84% | -1.65% | -1.55% | -1.48% |
| 2 | -2.73% | -2.6% | -2.02% | -1.76% | -1.61% | -1.52% | -1.47% |
| 3 | -2.72% | -2.29% | -1.87% | -1.67% | -1.56% | -1.5% | -1.47% |
| 4 | -2.25% | -1.98% | -1.71% | -1.59% | -1.52% | -1.48% | -1.46% |
| 5 | -1.79% | -1.67% | -1.56% | -1.5% | -1.47% | -1.46% | -1.45% |
| 6 | -1.32% | -1.36% | -1.4% | -1.42% | -1.43% | -1.43% | -1.44% |
The next table shows the expected return when banking.
| Expected Return as Banker in Washington State Pai Gow Poker |
Other Players |
$5 bet |
$10 bet |
$25 bet |
$50 bet |
$100 bet |
$200 bet |
$500 bet |
| 1 | -0.20% | -0.20% | 0.23% | 0.78% | 1.09% | 1.26% | 1.37% |
| 2 | -0.20% | -0.20% | 0.38% | 0.86% | 1.14% | 1.28% | 1.38% |
| 3 | -0.20% | -0.20% | 0.54% | 0.95% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
| 4 | -0.20% | -0.06% | 0.69% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 1.33% | 1.4% |
| 5 | -0.20% | 0.25% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.35% | 1.4% |
| 6 | 0.12% | 0.56% | 1% | 1.2% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.41% |
Note that for large bet sizes the sum of the expected return when banking and not banking is just under zero. So it would not be difficult to gain an overall advantage if some players declined to bank.
March 27, 2006
At the Borgata casino in AC, they have a different
rule regarding commission for pai gow poker than the rest of
the casinos. They only charge commissions in 50 cent
increments, rather than the 25 cent norm. When I played and
won a $25 hand, I only paid commission of $1. To what degree
does this lower the house edge?
From my pai gow poker section we have the
following probabilities:
Player wins both 28.61%
Tie 41.48%
Banker wins both 29.91%
So you are getting away with a 4% commission. As
player your expected value is .2861*0.96 - .2991 =
-2.44%. As banker (going one on one) your expected value is .2991*0.96 -
.2861 = 0.1036%. So a 4% commission lowers the house
edge by about 0.3%.
P.S. In May, 2008, a reader wrote to say that the Borgata does use quarters in pai gow poker, and forces bets to be in increments of $5.
April 3,
2005
I was recently in Las Vegas, and the casinos' methods
for playing two pair in Pai Gow Poker vary somewhat
significantly from your methodology. I was wondering whether
your rules are devised to optimize he player's chances
because you know how the house will play, or whether your
methodology is simply a better strategy than the house
method. If the answer is the former, then if a player banks,
the player should play the house way instead of your way? If
it is the latter, then your method should always be used.
However, if it is the latter, why don't the casinos use your
methodology?
My two pair rule is optimized to play against
the house way. However, I think it is probably just any
reasonable strategy. For example, I would use it when
banking against other players. The reason the casinos use
a more complicated and less powerful rule is probably out
of tradition. Whoever invented the game probably came up
with that strategy rather arbitrarily and it since become
a hard habit to break. Two other rules I find ridiculous
are counting A2345 (known as "the wheel") as the second
highest straight and bothering to state an exception in
the house way that if the dealer has five aces with a
pair of kings you should play the pair of kings in the low hand.
The probability of getting this hand is 1 in 25,690,513.
In my estimation this hand may have come up about 100
times in the history of the game, but has probably never
affected the outcome of a hand compared to the
alternative of playing a full house in the high hand. Yet
every single dealer to have dealt the game had to be
bothered with learning the exception.
March 10, 2005
At the Trump Casino in Gary, Indiana (near Chicago)
the fortune bonus in Pai Gow Poker pays out the regular
bonuses for a 3 of a kind or better, but also pays 1 to 1
for 3-pair. Statistically speaking, how will this increase
your chances of winning on the bonus? What percentage of the
time will a player have 3-pair in their hand?
The number of combinations for a three pair
without the joker is combin(13,3)*10*combin(4,2)^3*4/combin(52,7)
= 2,471,040. The number of combinations of a three pair
with the joker being used to complete a pair of aces is
23,776. The number of combinations of a three pair with
the joker as the singleton is 61,776. So, the total
combinations are 2,556,592. Out of total combin(53,7)=154,143,080
possible, the probability of a three pair is 1.659%. So,
changing a three pair from a loss to a win of 1 to 1
decreases the house edge by 3.32%. Assuming the standard
pay table on the other hands, this would sway the odds in
the player's favor with 3 or more other players.
Dec. 27, 2004
You specifically mention that the A2345 is the
second-highest straight. I saw one hand where the dealer had
it but lost to another straight that wasn't AKQJ10. I didn't
want to ask and cost a player his winnings. Is this a
hard-and-fast rule that the dealer just overlooked, or do
houses sometimes exclude it from their rules?
Aug. 12, 2004
There are some casinos that treat A2345 (known
as "the wheel") as the lowest straight but most still
treat it as the second highest straight. I will make a
note that this rule is a generality and not always the
case.
Can the player gain an advantage in Pai Gow Poker by
looking at the other player's cards?
I think this would put a small dent in the house
edge, assuming you know how to make the correct strategy
adjustments, but will not come anywhere close to
overcoming it. Aug. 12,
2004
I'm a big fan of your site. I was playing some hands
of Pai Gow Poker on my own and came across an unusual
situation. After splitting hands, the Player had a flush:
A,Q,10,8,3. The House also had a flush: A,joker,10,5,4. So
who wins? The rules simply state that the joker can be used
to complete a flush but does it have a rank? Can it be used
as a second Ace of the flush suit?
Thanks. I just asked a dealer and he confirmed
that the house would win that hand because the joker
would be used as a king. The general rule is the joker
can substitute for any specific card not already in the
same hand as long as it completes a straight, flush, or
straight flush. Otherwise it is treated as a fifth-suit
ace, thus allowing for the possibility of five aces.
July 11, 2004
I go to Vegas once a year and enjoy playing Pai Gow
poker there because all casinos near me do not allow
banking. My question is: How big of an etiquette breach is
it for players to pull away bets and not play a hand when
someone decides to bank. This has happened to me often
(usually at smaller casinos, Sahara, etc...) and usually
players say "If I wanted to give another player my money I'd
play in the poker room" This really bothers me and I just
wanted your thoughts.
This would make me furious too. While not
banking it should not make any difference who is banking.
I have never heard of an etiquette rule written about
this situation but it falls under a breach of common
courtesy in my opinion. June 25,
2004
I see on your site the house way in pai gow poker
varies from one casino to another. Which is the one that
gives the player the best odds?
The various house ways are all very similar and
only differ in rare or borderline plays. I have often
heard dealer's comment that their casino uses a
conservative house way that tries to balance the hands,
resulting in more pushes. However, I would doubt if anyone
has ever done a comparison study.
April 4, 2004
At the new Seneca/Niagara Casino in Niagara Falls NY
they refuse to give me a copy of their house way for pai gow
poker. I would like to know the house way before I play. Do
they have to provide that info?
They probably don't have to. Once at the
Tropicana in Atlantic City their pai gow poker rules said
the house way was available upon request. So I requested
it and they ran out of public copies and couldn't show me
a house copy because it didn't have the Gambler's
Anonymous disclaimer on it. In my opinion, the player
should always have the right to know the rules of a game,
but unfortunately all gaming authorities seem to think
differently. Oct. 15,
2003
Which are the most and least volatile games?
Pai gow poker is the least volatile and on
average keno is the most. July
14, 2003
Hi, my friends were playing pai-gow and one of the
other players had a royal flush with a 3 and 4, and the
house also had a royal flush with a 3 and 4 (so the player
lost with a royal flush, poor sucker). I was wondering, what
are the chances of this happening? Thank you! I really enjoy
your website. - Diane
The probability of two specific players ties
with a royal flush and any two other cards are about 1 in
290 billion. March 7,
2003
In Washington state some of the small non-Indian
casinos offer "no-commission" pai-gow so you only lose
equality on 'copies'. Without getting into the various house
ways can you give some idea of how this improves the player
odds? - R.S. from Seattle, US
The good news in Washington State is that there is no 5% commission, as you said. The bad news is that the dealer is always the banker, thus the player always loses on copies. Overall the house edge in the Washington game is 1.44%. Nov. 28, 2002
In Stanford Wong's book, "Optimal Strategy for Pai Gow
Poker", he presents an analysis of when to keep any two
pairs together. Have you done a similar analysis? If not, do
you think his analysis gives the optimal plays? - Mike from
New York, USA
Yes, I have done a similar analysis. It can be
found in my pai
gow poker appendix 2. There are some important
difference between my strategy and his. Wong's is much
more detailed, considering the highest two singletons,
while mine only considers the single highest. Wong also
differentiates between whether the player is banking or
not. Finally Wong's book is based on the California game
with no 5% commission, unlike my strategy. I do trust
Wong's work and don't disagree with his
table. Jan. 15, 2002
What is the probability of being dealt a natural seven
card straight flush in pai gow poker? I work in a casino and
just saw this for the first time in 15 years. The lucky
patron won $40,000. - Michael from Southhaven,
Mississippi
There are 32 possible natural straight flushes
(4 ranks times 8 possible spans of 7 cards). There are
combin(53,7) = 154,143,080 possible ways 7 cards can be
drawn out of 53. So the answer is 32/154,143,080, or 1 in
4,816,971. Nov. 23,
2001
I was recently playing Pai Gow Poker at the Barona
Casino near San Diego, CA. They have different rules from
Las Vegas, namely 1) They collect a commission on every hand
played - $0.50 on bets between $5-$25 and $1.00 on bets
between $30-$100. If every player at the table pushes, the
commission is not collected for anyone on the next hand. 2)
The Joker is a true "wild" card. Not only does it fill out
straights and flushes, but it can be any other card needed
in any case. For instance I had the Ks Kd 6c 6s 9h 9d and
the Joker. I was able to put the two Kings in the low hand
and keep the other 5 cards for a Full House! My question: Is
this a better game for the player than the Las Vegas
versions, even with the commission on every hand? (I seemed
to like it. I ended up winning $142.50 after playing for 3
hours.) - Don from Racine, Wisconsin
Good question. I assume player banking is still
allowed. The 5% commission at the Nevada casinos costs
the player 1.46%. The house edge in your game depends on
how much you bet. It is lowest for a $100 bet, at 1%. I'm
ignoring the rule about everybody pushing, that will
lower the edge even more. Much like the card rooms in
the Los Angeles area, I think there is potential to beat
the house edge if you bank enough of a percentage of the
action. Sept. 20,
2001
p.s. In 2007 I received an unconfirmed report that player banking is not allowed in this game.
As a math/statistics instructor, I must say that your
site should be required reading before anyone ventures into
a casino. I like to bank when playing Pai Gow Poker in
Nevada casinos. In Tahoe I can usually bank every other
hand. I'm in Vegas far less often and there are more casinos
to check out. Do you know which ones will allow you to bank
every other hand at a full table (if no other players wish
to bank)? It seems to be one in seven some places and one in
twelve others. Also, some Tahoe casinos have a jackpot game
based on how a players five-card hand. A sucker bet, but as
a banker I like it when other players bet it. They'll often
set their hand for the jackpot (paid by the house) at the
expense of there standard wager (against me) by splitting
two high pair to play a straight with 2 singletons, or
keeping a full house together and putting two singletons up
instead of 3 down, pair up. Do you have any idea which Vegas
or Reno casinos do this? - Tom from Fairfield, USA
Thanks for your kind words. Actually, I have been
asked about teaching a course on the mathematics of
gambling at UNLV. Pai gow poker is not my game so I don't
follow the details very closely. I do know, as you
stated, that some rotate and some zig zag the banker
between the players and dealer. However, I don't keep
track of who does it which way, sorry. I've also seen
that progressive side bet at lots of casinos around town.
Again, I don't keep track of who specifically has it.
However, banking against it is a great idea, I
have never thought of that. Sorry I wasn't much help.
First let me say, I think your web site is really
great. I have told a few people about it, and hope they will
try it too. I wish you continued success with it. I also
liked the link to WinPoker. I liked WinPoker enough to order
it. This is a great program. I have a question I am hoping
you can help me with. I have been trying to figure out the
number of times each hand in 7 card stud occurs. I have a
copy of your 7 card table, but I am interested in the
mathematics to arrive at those numbers. I can figure out the
5 card numbers, but the 7 card just baffles me. I would like
to send an Excel 2000 file with my numbers. I would also
like to know how to figure the number of straights in a
53-card deck with a Joker. H E L P ! ! ! - Stan from
Harahan, Louisiana
Thanks for your kind words. I agree that
calculating the numbers for seven-card stud is hard. That
is why I do it on my computer. My program goes through all
possible combinations and scores each one. The number of
wild straights in pai gow poker is
11*(44-4)+10*3*(44-4)=10,332.
Combined with the 10,200 natural straights the total is
20,532. May 1, 2001
In your play-for-fun pai-gow poker, if you have
nothing and drop your 2nd and 3rd highest cards to the front
hand, the Advice will occasionally swap the 3rd highest for
the 4th highest. I haven't been able to figure out the rule
-- first I thought it always did that when your back hand
was ace-high, but that didn't hold up. Is it because the
house way requires the dealer to drop the 2nd and 3rd
highest, so if you and the dealer have equally bad hands,
the front hand will be decided by your 2nd highest card but
keeping the 3rd highest in the back hand has a better chance
of winning? If so, why doesn't it do that all the time? I'm
confounded by this. I haven't been able to see the pattern.
Please enlighten me! - Sarah from Chicago, USA
Sometimes the two-card hand is so bad that it is
better to put the third highest card as a kicker in the
five-card hand. There is no rule of thumb by which to advise
exactly when to do so, but I have noticed it tends to
happen when the second highest card is rather low. The
logic my program uses is a large array of probabilities
that each hand will win and goes with the hand with the
greatest possible sum of probabilities that won't
spoil the hand. Feb. 10,
2001
In your rules for pai-gow poker you state that
A-2-3-4-5 is the 2nd highest straight. Why isn't 9-10-J-Q-K
the 2nd highest straight. Please explain. - Gordon from
Lewiston, New York
I have always wondered this myself. It is
probably just one of those weird things like why we spell
colonel the way we do. Jan. 14,
2001
You definitely have a problem with the advice feature
of this game. In circumstances where you have one pair, you
play the pair in the five card hand and the next best two
cards in the two card hand. In circumstances you don't have
at least a pair, play the 2 & 3 highest card in two card
hand. Your advice button gives bad advice. For
instance:
My Way: 9 Q - 2 4 6 8 A, Java: 8 Q - 2 4 6 9 A
My Way: 8 10 - 2 3 5 7 K, Java: 7 10 - 2 3 5 8 K
My Way: 5 10 - 2 3 4 8 8, Java: 4 10 - 2 3 5 8 8
Is there something that I am missing here? Is there
another strategy at play? It doesn't make sense in these
circumstances to reduce the two card hand value to protect
more against matching the pair with the dealer which would
seem to rarely occur. Thoughts? -- Kevin
The rule to put the 2nd and 3rd highest in front
is a generality, but is not always the best play. In
these situations the front hand is so bad that it is
better to put the good kicker in back. Lets look at the
following probabilities of winning the first example you
sited. See my pai
gow appendix for the source of these numbers.
- Q/8: 0.2108
- Q/9: 0.2269
- A/8: 0.1019
- A/9: 0.1245
The expected return of playing Q/8 in front is
.95*.2108*.1245-(1-.2108)*(1-.1245) = -0.66012. The
expected return of playing Q/9 in front is
.95*.2269*.1019-(1-.2269)*(1-.1019) = -0.672356. You can
see that my play has the greater expected return. This
kind of sacrifice of the lower hand for the benefit of
the higher hand is even more common in pai gow
tiles. Dec. 10,
2000
Hi, I am regular player of Pai Gow Poker, and I
noticed your site has a lot of great information on the
game. The other day when I was playing with a friend of mine
he was dealt a 9 high hand, which I believe is the lowest
hand possible. In all the time I had spent playing the game
I had only seem it happen once before. Then five hands later
he got the exact same hand(2-3-4-5-7-8-9). We couldn't
believe it and were wondering what the odds of that
happening were so we thought we would ask you. Thanks for
your time and your great site. ñ Doug from
Calgary, Canada
There are two ways to arrange the ranks to form
a 9 high hand, the one you mentioned and 2-3-4-6-7-8-9.
The number of suit combinations without forming a flush
is 47-4*(combin(7,5)*3^2+6*3+1) = 15,552. So,
the probability of a 9 high hand is 2*15,552/combin(53,7)
= 31,104/154,143,080, or 1 in 9,911. If you were to play just
5 times the probability of getting two 9-high hands would
be 1 in 9,826,685. I believe that this happened due to coincidence as opposed to a fault in the random number
generator or the coding of the
program. Dec. 10,
2000
What is the probability of getting three pair in Pai
Gow? Are the chances lesser or greater than three of a kind?
- Alex of Long Beach, Mississippi
Not counting a three of a kind and two pairs, the
following are the ways to get a three pair and number of
combinations.
No wild card: combin(13,3)*10*63*4
=2,471,040
Wild card used to compete pair of aces:
combin(12,2)*10*62*42 = 380,160
Wild card used as singleton ace:
combin(12,3)*63 = 47,520
The total number of combinations is 2,898,720. This is
less than half of the 7,470,676 combinations for a three of
a kind. Nov. 11,
2000
Great site! Is there any way I can download your pai
gow practice program to preclude always having to play
online? Thanks in advance. - Abraham of Ocean, New
Jersey
I can send the class file as an attachment to an
e-mail. Let me know if this is okay. It is my policy to
not send binary attachments unless specifically
requested. Nov. 4,
2000
Wizard, love your site. In Pai Gow Poker should the
Fortune side bet be made in your opinion. Thanks, I enjoy
all your info. Eddie from West Memphis, Arkansas
I was just in West Memphis in July. While
visiting my cousin on the Tennessee side of Memphis, I
drove over the bridge to be able to say I've been to
Arkansas. Just eleven more states to go now. To answer
your question, no, you should not make the Fortune side
bet, or any other side bet. For more information on the
Fortune side bet visit my pai
gow poker section. Oct. 15,
2000
I play pai gow poker in Atlantic City. Frequently I
observe a player playing two hands. My question is: does
looking at 14 cards out of 53 give the player any kind of
advantage. If so, what %, what kind of change in strategy
does entail. Would appreciate any advice. ñ John from
Baltimore, Maryland
Sometimes in pai gow poker the dealer sets aside
a dragon which is offered to each player in turn. This is
like playing two hands and is likely what you are
observing. However, when playing the dragon hand, the rules
generally specify that it must be set according to the
house way. If the player could set the dragon hand at
will it would definitely help, assuming he could apply
the information from his original hand properly. I can
not give an exact percentage, this would be very
complicated to determine.
Sept. 26, 2000
©1998-2008 Wizard Of Odds Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy/Terms
Contact
Advertise
About Us
Links
RSS
|