|
|
Reason #2 why the Wizard likes Bodog:
No-hassle practice games
Most online casinos spend more effort trying to separate you from your money than they do trying to give you a good experience. They have all kinds of popup windows, they usually make you download their software, and if do they offer play-in-browser games then you have to register an account before you can play. And if you do register then they start sending you emails trying to get you to deposit real money.
But Bodog is different. They have no popup windows at all, and their practice games play right in your browser, with no download, and no registration required. You don't even have to give up your email address. It couldn't be simpler: Just one click and you're playing the game.
I wish all online casinos showed this much respect for their players. Other casinos practically ask for your first born child to play for free. Meanwhile Bodog is patient and does not twist anybody's arm to play for real money. You can play as long as you like for free with no obligation. The real-money games are available if that's your preference, but if not, you can play the free practice games for as long as you like without hassle. (Visit Bodog)
Try blackjack at Bodog. One click and you're in:
 No popups, no download, no registration, no B.S., just the game.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
.
|
A small number of sports betters beat the games, in
the long run, by arduous study, use of computers, etc. Are
there bettors who use these methods to become long term
winners at beating the horse races?
Betting on the horses is one of my weakest areas
when it comes to gambling. I have heard that "bridge
jumper" bets (a bet on a huge favorite to show) can
sometimes be a good bet due to the guaranteed $2.20
minimum return on a $2 bet. However, I do not know of a way to
have a consistent edge nor do I know any person who is successful as
a professional racetrack bettor. Nonetheless, I don't deny that the
track can be beat. In the book
"Gambling Wizards", author Richard Munchkin tells the
story about one professional gambler's success at the
racetracks in Hong Kong, where the track cut is less than
in the United States. August 12,
2004
Hi Wiz, great site. I recently made a wager on all
others in the Kentucky Derby futures betting. My odds closed
at 5/2 I know that this is about $7.00for a $2.00 wager, but
in watching the odds, I believe that it was closer to 3/1.
Can you help me figure the actual payoff for $2.00? The
total pool was $577,889 and $125,353 was wagered on my bet.
Thank you for any help. - Donald Taylor from Watervliet,
USA
Thanks for the compliment. Let's let c equal the
track cut. If the odds closed at 5-2 then:
(577,889*(1-c)-125,353)/125,353 = 2.5
577,889*(1-c)-125,353=313,382.5
577,889*(1-c)=438,735.5
1-c=0.7592
c=0.2408
So the track cut was 24%. For a futures bet this is
not unusual. This illustrates why futures are a bad
bet. March 17,
2002
When wagering on a greyhound race, they give odds on
each dog such as "9-2, 7-2, 10-1" what do the numbers
represent? - Rick from Valley Center, USA
The 9-2 means that a $2 bet would win $9. So if
you bet $2 you would get back $11, $9 in winnings plus
the original $2. Likewise, the 7-2 bet would win $7 for a
$2 bet, and 10-1 means a $1 bet would win $10.
Jan. 14, 2001
I've had this argument with several friends and I
hope you can help. They say horse racing is a bad bet
because of the "takeout". It's true the track has a takeout
that varies from about 16% to 30%, depending on the type of
wager, but my contention is that there is no factually
correct way to determine a horses "true odds". If you figure
a horse has a 50% chance of winning, but the odds are 3-1,
isn't that a good bet, no matter what the takeout is ? I
know some handicappers that set their own odds and only bet
when they feel the odds are in their favor, and some do
well. - Kevin Hill from Van Nuys, California
A good bet is a good bet, regardless of whom
it is against. However, you can't ignore the high house
cut at the track. You also can never be sure of what the
true odds are at the track. If I thought a horse had a
50% chance of winning but paid 3:1 then I would doubt my
own judgement that the horse really had a 50% chance of
winning. Along the same lines, when choosing a mutual fund
you should consider both the historic rate of return
and commission charges.
July 30, 2000
©1998-2008 Wizard Of Odds Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms & Conditions
Contact
Advertise
About Us
Links
|
|