Ask the Wizard #254

The play that I think has the highest probability of being played incorrectly by blackjack players is splitting 4,4 against a 5 or 6 when double after split is allowed. The probability of getting one or the other situation in a six-deck game is 1 in 1135. According to my blackjack appendix 9 , assuming the player hits instead of splitting, the cost in expected value is 2.83% against a 5 and 4.38% against a 6. Overall, the house edge of the game goes up by 0.0032% when the player habitually makes this mistake every time it occurs. So, it isn’t a very costly error, because it happens so infrequently. However, I don’t think I’ve ever seen another player correctly split in this situation. When I do, the dealers and other players usually roll their eyes. Once I heard another player incorrectly say to the dealer, as if I wasn’t there, "You should never split any hand that starts with an F."

If the question were what is the most costly mistake, considering both the frequency of the play and cost of the error, then I can only hazard a guess. That guess would be that the #1 error is not soft doubling when you are supposed to. Seldom do I see recreational players double a hand like soft 17 against a 6. The following table shows the increase in the house edge as a result of four commonly made mistakes. This table assumes the player always makes the error when the situation occurs, instead taking the second best option. For standing on 12 against a 2 or 3 I did not include a player 6,6.

Frequent Blackjack Errors
Error	Probability	Avg. Cost per Incident	Cost per Hand
Never soft double	0.016430	0.054357	0.000893
Stand on 12 against 2 or 3	0.000380	0.029955	0.000380
Stand on soft 18 against 9-A	0.000205	0.041605	0.000205
Hit 8,8 against 9-A	0.000194	0.081779	0.000194

This question was raised and discussed in the forum of my companion site Wizard of Vegas .

The average number of bets such a player will have on the table for any one throw is 3.6. If the player is betting $10 at a time, for example, then a fair average bet would be $36.

This is a binomial distribution kind of problem. The general formula is that if the probability of an event is p, and each outcome is independent, then the probability of it happening exactly w out of t trials is combin(t,w)×p^w×(1-p)^t-w.

In this case, there are 2 ways to make the straight flush. You need the 8 of diamonds and another card of either the 6 or J of diamonds. There are combin(47,2)=1,081 ways to draw 2 cards out of the 47 left in the deck. So, the probability of getting a straight flush in any one hand is 2/1,081 = 0.0018501. The probability of making 3 out of 10 is combin(10,3)×0.0018501³×(1-0.0018501)⁷ = 0.000000750178, or 1 in 1,333,017.

On the come out roll there are three possible outcomes at this point.

1. Sevening out.
2. Repeating a point already made (4 to 9).
3. Rolling a 10 on the come out roll, and then making it.

We need to quantify the second and third probabilities only. The shooter will eventually make a point, and then eventually make it or seven out. The probability that the point established and then made is 4 to 9 is:

(3/24)×(3/9) + (4/24)×(4/10) + (5/24)×(5/11) + (5/24)×(5/11) + (4/24)×(4/10) = 0.364394.

The probability of establishing a 10 point and then making it is (3/24)*(1/3) = 0.041667.

Let p be the probability of making a 10 point before sevening out. If the player makes any other point, he is right back to where he started from. So...

p = 0.364394 × p + 0.041667
p × (1-0.364394) = 0.041667
p = 0.041667/(1-0.364394)
p = 0.065554

This question was raised and discussed in the forum of my companion site Wizard of Vegas .

Cryptologic Internet casinos have such a game, called Bonus Video Poker , where discards are put back in the deck. The 40-20-9-6 Jacks or Better pay table in that game returns 95.2642%, before considering the redraw bonus feature, which I won’t get into here. In conventional video poker, that pay table would return 98.2534%. So, in this example, putting the discards back in the deck costs the player almost 3%. However, I highly doubt that actually happened on a machine in Atlantic City.

This question was raised and discussed in the forum of my companion site Wizard of Vegas .